vciy

CVE-2023-2025

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Exposure of Sensitive Information in OpenBlue Enterprise Manager Data Collector

CVE-2023-20254 of 4 sources documented this
18

rank 18 = 0 + 16 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00515  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$6,180over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$6,180 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.00515 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00515EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-05-19, 1123 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

TIBCOCVE-2016-2388checkpoint CheckCisco CatalystCVE-2016-6415Cisco Adaptive2025

This record is one instance of CWE-200, exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor. The index holds 11146 prior instances of this class, 18 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Jci5 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
What it costs
JciPartial confidentiality loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Johnson Controls OpenBlue Enterprise…? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actorreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-200: Confidentiality: Read Application Data[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in3.2.5.75receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00515 · top 57% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byjcireceipt
Recorded changes23 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productJohnson Controls OpenBlue Enterprise Manager Data Collectorreceipt
Published rangesjohnsoncontrols openblue enterprise manager data collector < 3.2.5.75receipt
Fixed in3.2.5.75receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

OpenBlue Enterprise Manager Data Collector versions prior to 3.2.5.75 may expose sensitive information to an unauthorized user under certain circumstances. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-200; CWE-668
affected versions
johnsoncontrols openblue enterprise manager data collector < 3.2.5.75
also scored by
[email protected] 5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

The CNA scored it 5 and NVD 6.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself johnsoncontrols.com cisa.gov receipt

Movement the material steps

19 May 20230.00043
17 Mar 20250.00088 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00515 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 23 observations
19 May 20230.00043
26 May 20230.00049
17 Apr 20240.00069
24 May 20240.00116
28 Oct 20240.00114
8 Dec 20240.00117
17 Dec 20240.00081
17 Mar 20250.00088
19 Mar 20250.00103
29 Mar 20250.00185
30 Mar 20250.00103
18 Nov 20250.00205
21 Nov 20250.00103
10 Feb 20260.00129
14 Mar 20260.00138
19 May 20260.00118
26 May 20260.00137
27 May 20260.00154
29 May 20260.00187
30 May 20260.00213
31 May 20260.00202
7 Jun 20260.00244
15 Jun 20260.00515

23 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00515Published2023-05-18Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 3 years when this index was last written.

Published 2023-05-18 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-200, exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor. The index holds 11146 prior instances of this class, 18 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2018-5430 · TIBCO JasperReports Servermatches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2016-2388matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2024-24919 · checkpoint Check Point Quantum Gateway, Spark…matches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2026-20133 · Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Managermatches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2016-6415matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2020-3259 · Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA)…matches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2020receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

11146 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

icsa-23-138-04

Of the 2 records in this advisory, this is the only one that does not hold public proof-of-concept code. That is a fact about what the catalogue records, not a finding about exposure.

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2023-2025.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.