vciy

CVE-2022-47318

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

ruby-git versions prior to v1.13.0 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute an arbitrary ruby code by having a user to load a repository…

CVE-2022-473184 of 4 sources documented this
25

rank 25 = 0 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01360  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.0, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

3 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$67,900over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$67,900 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.0136 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.0136EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-01-18, 1244 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2012-0158MicrosoftDotNetNuke CMSActiveMQ BrokerGoogle ChromeSonicWall SMA100047318

This record is one instance of CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'). The index holds 7185 prior instances of this class, 79 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running ruby-git? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · user interaction required · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-94: Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchproject ruby-git 1.13.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.0136 · top 30% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth3 products across 3 vendorsderived
Assigned byjpcertreceipt
Recorded changes34 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productruby-gitreceipt
Published rangesruby-git project ruby-git < 1.13.0; debian linux 10.0; fedoraproject fedora 37receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

ruby-git versions prior to v1.13.0 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute an arbitrary ruby code by having a user to load a repository containing a specially crafted filename to the product. This vulnerability is different from CVE-2022-46648. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-94
affected versions
ruby-git project ruby-git < 1.13.0; debian linux 10.0; fedoraproject fedora 37
also scored by
8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself github.com github.com jvn.jp lists.fedoraproject.org lists.debian.org receipt

Movement the material steps

18 Jan 20230.01061
7 Mar 20230.00117 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00683 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.0136 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 34 observations
18 Jan 20230.01061
30 Jan 20230.01132
7 Mar 20230.00117
26 Apr 20230.00124
8 May 20230.00117
18 Dec 20230.00125
24 Jan 20240.00253
23 Apr 20240.00268
6 May 20240.00206
9 Aug 20240.00223
24 Aug 20240.00234
7 Sep 20240.00279
17 Dec 20240.00316
17 Mar 20250.00683
29 Mar 20250.01146
30 Mar 20250.00683
5 Apr 20250.00439
6 Jun 20250.00796
7 Jun 20250.00693
16 Sep 20250.00712
21 Sep 20250.00693
13 Nov 20250.007
18 Nov 20250.0101
21 Nov 20250.007
23 Dec 20250.00719
5 Jan 20260.007
18 Jan 20260.00546
23 Jan 20260.00531
27 Jan 20260.0061
4 Feb 20260.00708
13 May 20260.00437
20 May 20260.00465
7 Jun 20260.00438
15 Jun 20260.0136

34 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.0136Published2023-01-17Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 3 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2023-01-17 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'). The index holds 7185 prior instances of this class, 79 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2012-0158matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2012receipt
CVE-2025-49704 · Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2017-9822 · DotNetNuke CMS Fixed in 9.1.1matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2026-34197 · Apache ActiveMQ Brokermatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-3910 · Google Chromematches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-15410 · SonicWall SMA1000matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

7185 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

ruby-git

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-47318.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.