vciy

CVE-2022-46175

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

JSON5 is an extension to the popular JSON file format that aims to be easier to write and maintain by hand (e.g

CVE-2022-461754 of 4 sources documented this
47

rank 47 = 16 + 22 + 4 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.09304  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-11-19  ·  without this subject the record ranks 43

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

3 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 42

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 47

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$431,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$801,000on 2026-01-09, the last material move, 5 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$431,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.928046732894921 exposure x 0.09304 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.09304EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.1 HIGHreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.03391 to 0.09304 across 80 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M7.1 HIGHreceipt
NVD8.8 HIGHreceipt
What it costs
GitHub_MComplete confidentiality and availability loss; partial integrity lossreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running json5? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality and availability loss; partial integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-1321 Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-1321: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: Read Application Data, Modify Application Data; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchjson5 1.0.2; json5 2.2.2receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository, 2023-01-11.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository2023-01-11receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.1 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.09304 · top 5% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 2 vendorsderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes83 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productjson5receipt
Published rangesjson5 < 1.0.2; json5 >= 2.0.0 < 2.2.2; fedoraproject fedora 37receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires low privilegesjson5CWE-1321 weaknessConfidentiality and availability lo…C:H / A:Hexploits CWE-1321data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

JSON5 is an extension to the popular JSON file format that aims to be easier to write and maintain by hand (e.g. for config files). The `parse` method of the JSON5 library before and including versions 1.0.1 and 2.2.1 does not restrict parsing of keys named `__proto__`, allowing specially crafted strings to pollute the prototype of the resulting object. This vulnerability pollutes the prototype of the object returned by `JSON5.parse` and not the global Object prototype, which is the commonly understood definition of Prototype Pollution. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

However, polluting the prototype of a single object can have significant security impact for an application if the object is later used in trusted operations. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to set arbitrary and unexpected keys on the object returned from `JSON5.parse`. The actual impact will depend on how applications utilize the returned object and how they filter unwanted keys, but could include denial of service, cross-site scripting, elevation of privilege, and in extreme cases, remote code execution. `JSON5.parse` should restrict parsing of `__proto__` keys when parsing JSON strings to objects. As a point of reference, the `JSON.parse` method included in JavaScript ignores `__proto__` keys. Simply changing `JSON5.parse` to `JSON.parse` in the examples above mitigates this vulnerability. This vulnerability is patched in json5 versions 1.0.2, 2.2.2, and later.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-1321
affected versions
json5 < 1.0.2; json5 >= 2.0.0 < 2.2.2; fedoraproject fedora 37
also scored by
[email protected] 7.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H

The CNA scored it 7.1 and NVD 8.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com github.com lists.fedoraproject.org lists.debian.org receipt

Dated events

2022-12-31EPSS moved 0.03 to 0.332025-03-17EPSS moved 0.01 to 0.432026-06-15EPSS moved 0.42 to 0.09

Movement the material steps

24 Dec 20220.03391
31 Dec 20220.32558 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.00262 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.42862 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
19 Mar 20250.19467
20 Mar 20250.3997
23 Mar 20250.19467
25 Mar 20250.3997
18 Apr 20250.51984 · crossed 0.50
21 Apr 20250.3997 · crossed 0.50
18 Nov 20250.243
19 Nov 20250.50239 · crossed 0.50
21 Nov 20250.3874 · crossed 0.50
7 Jan 20260.54083 · crossed 0.50
9 Jan 20260.36789 · crossed 0.50
15 Jun 20260.09304 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 80 observations
24 Dec 20220.03391
31 Dec 20220.32558
4 Jan 20230.39266
7 Mar 20230.00262
8 May 20230.00225
8 Jul 20230.00214
23 Nov 20230.00253
26 Nov 20230.00284
30 Dec 20230.00401
25 Jan 20240.00515
30 Mar 20240.00571
16 Jul 20240.00551
31 Jul 20240.00667
14 Aug 20240.01027
22 Nov 20240.01450
17 Dec 20240.00849
17 Mar 20250.42862
18 Mar 20250.3997
19 Mar 20250.19467
20 Mar 20250.3997
23 Mar 20250.19467
25 Mar 20250.3997
27 Mar 20250.34179
28 Mar 20250.3997
29 Mar 20250.34179
30 Mar 20250.3997
1 Apr 20250.42862
2 Apr 20250.3997
13 Apr 20250.42862
14 Apr 20250.3997
18 Apr 20250.51984
21 Apr 20250.3997
26 Apr 20250.37736
1 May 20250.406
5 May 20250.37736
9 May 20250.3997
18 May 20250.3822
1 Jun 20250.41091
4 Jun 20250.43543
10 Jun 20250.40646
12 Jun 20250.42414
1 Jul 20250.4532
5 Jul 20250.42414
17 Jul 20250.44689
1 Aug 20250.47594
4 Aug 20250.43392
5 Aug 20250.40495
1 Sep 20250.43392
4 Sep 20250.40495
1 Oct 20250.43392
4 Oct 20250.40495
17 Oct 20250.37736
22 Oct 20250.40495
1 Nov 20250.40068
4 Nov 20250.40495
16 Nov 20250.3874
18 Nov 20250.243
19 Nov 20250.50239
21 Nov 20250.3874
25 Nov 20250.40495
26 Nov 20250.37736
1 Dec 20250.37315
4 Dec 20250.37736
9 Dec 20250.40495
25 Dec 20250.42651
27 Dec 20250.36789
1 Jan 20260.36372
4 Jan 20260.36789
7 Jan 20260.54083
9 Jan 20260.36789
11 Jan 20260.39945
14 Jan 20260.37195
27 Jan 20260.39945
1 Feb 20260.3952
4 Feb 20260.39945
1 Mar 20260.3952
4 Mar 20260.46501
22 May 20260.44079
4 Jun 20260.42304
15 Jun 20260.09304

80 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.09304Published2022-12-24Public PoC2023-01-11Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-19 and 2025-03-20 (0.19467 → 0.3997) and the record had been public for 3 years, 5 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-12-24 receipt · Public PoC 2023-01-11 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-46175.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.