vciy

CVE-2022-43971

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Arbitrary code execution in Linksys WUMC710

CVE-2022-439714 of 4 sources documented this
22

rank 22 = 0 + 18 + 0 + 4 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01682  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.2, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 4

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

2 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$83,900over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$83,900 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.01682 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01682EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.2 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-01-10, 1252 days at 0.02, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2023-43208CVE-2021-27104CVE-2019-15107CVE-2019-16057CVE-2018-10562CVE-2018-1113843971

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Linksys WUMC710 Wireless-AC Universal…? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchwumc710 firmware 1.0.02receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.2 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.2 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.01682 · top 24% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bytrellixreceipt
Recorded changes34 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productLinksys WUMC710 Wireless-AC Universal Media Connectorreceipt
Published rangeslinksys wumc710 firmware < 1.0.02; linksys wumc710 firmware 1.0.02receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires high privilegesLinksys WUMC710 Wireless-AC Univers…CWE-78 OS command injectionFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-78data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

An arbitrary code exection vulnerability exists in Linksys WUMC710 Wireless-AC Universal Media Connector with firmware <= 1.0.02 (build3). The do_setNTP function within the httpd binary uses unvalidated user input in the construction of a system command. An authenticated attacker with administrator privileges can leverage this vulnerability over the network via a malicious GET or POST request to /setNTP.cgi to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux operating system as root. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-78
affected versions
linksys wumc710 firmware < 1.0.02; linksys wumc710 firmware 1.0.02
also scored by
[email protected] 7.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself youtu.be youtu.be youtu.be receipt

Movement the material steps

10 Jan 20230.0089
7 Mar 20236.9e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00833 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.01682 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 34 observations
10 Jan 20230.0089
7 Mar 20236.9e-4
8 Mar 20230.00069
25 Jul 20230.00068
16 Nov 20230.00080
10 Dec 20230.00078
16 Jan 20240.00144
25 May 20240.00205
21 Jun 20240.00206
1 Aug 20240.00388
16 Aug 20240.00496
30 Aug 20240.00595
13 Sep 20240.00765
25 Nov 20240.01082
17 Dec 20240.00819
17 Mar 20250.00833
29 Mar 20250.01904
30 Mar 20250.00605
10 May 20250.00629
20 Jun 20250.00731
5 Jul 20250.00703
20 Jul 20250.00771
2 Aug 20250.00826
20 Aug 20250.0068
4 Oct 20250.00849
5 Nov 20250.00858
18 Nov 20250.01441
21 Nov 20250.00858
10 Jan 20260.01148
11 Jan 20260.01331
14 Jan 20260.008
17 Jan 20260.01616
17 Mar 20260.00831
15 Jun 20260.01682

34 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01682Published2023-01-09Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2026-01-14 and 2026-01-17 (0.008 → 0.01616) and the record had been public for 3 years, 5 months when this index was last written.

Published 2023-01-09 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-43208matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-27104matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2019-15107matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2019-16057matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2018-10562matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-11138matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-43971.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.