vciy

CVE-2022-3927

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

The affected products store public and private key that are used to sign and protect custom parameter set files from modification.

CVE-2022-39274 of 4 sources documented this
29

rank 29 = 0 + 25 + 0 + 4 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00569  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 4

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

2 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$28,400over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$28,400 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.00569 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00569EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-01-06, 1256 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

GladinetCVE-2021-44207Dell RecoverPointCVE-2022-28810CVE-2020-8657Cisco Smart3927

This record is one instance of CWE-798, use of hard-coded credentials. The index holds 1840 prior instances of this class, 12 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Hitachi Energy8 HIGHreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
What it costs
Hitachi EnergyComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Hitachi Energy FOXMAN-UN? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-798 Use of Hard-coded Credentialsreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-798: Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, Other: Read Application Data, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Execute Unauthorized…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inFOXMAN-UN R16A; UNEM R16Areceipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.00569 · top 54% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byHitachi Energyreceipt
Recorded changes21 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productHitachi Energy FOXMAN-UN; Hitachi Energy UNEMreceipt
Published rangeshitachienergy foxman-un < r16a; hitachienergy unem < r16areceipt
Fixed inFOXMAN-UN R16A; UNEM R16Areceipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires high privilegesHitachi Energy UNEMCWE-798 hardcoded credentialsAdjacent componentsscope changeFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-798scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

The affected products store both public and private key that are used to sign and protect Custom Parameter Set (CPS) file from modification. An attacker that manages to exploit this vulnerability will be able to change the CPS file, sign it so that it is trusted as the legitimate CPS file. This issue affects * FOXMAN-UN product: FOXMAN-UN R15B, FOXMAN-UN R15A, FOXMAN-UN R14B, FOXMAN-UN R14A, FOXMAN-UN R11B, FOXMAN-UN R11A, FOXMAN-UN R10C, FOXMAN-UN R9C; * UNEM product: UNEM R15B, UNEM R15A, UNEM R14B, UNEM R14A, UNEM R11B, UNEM R11A, UNEM R10C, UNEM R9C. List of CPEs: * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R15B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R15 receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R14B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R14A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R11B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R11A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R10C:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R9C:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R15B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R15A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R14B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R14A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R11B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R11A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R10C:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R9C:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-798
affected versions
hitachienergy foxman-un < r16a; hitachienergy unem < r16a
also scored by
[email protected] 8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

The CNA scored it 8 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself search.abb.com search.abb.com receipt

Movement the material steps

6 Jan 20230.09029
7 Mar 20239.1e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00132 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00569 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 21 observations
6 Jan 20230.09029
23 Feb 20230.00885
7 Mar 20239.1e-4
8 Mar 20230.00091
6 Dec 20230.00105
12 Jan 20240.00166
7 Feb 20240.00187
17 Jun 20240.00214
28 Jul 20240.00221
17 Mar 20250.00132
29 Mar 20250.00232
30 Mar 20250.00132
16 Jul 20250.00145
30 Sep 20250.00182
1 Nov 20250.00194
18 Nov 20250.00469
21 Nov 20250.00194
7 Jan 20260.00437
13 Jan 20260.00434
19 Jan 20260.00469
15 Jun 20260.00569

21 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00569Published2023-01-05Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 3 years, 5 months when this index was last written.

Published 2023-01-05 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-798, use of hard-coded credentials. The index holds 1840 prior instances of this class, 12 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2025-30406 · Gladinet CentreStackmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2021-44207matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2026-22769 · Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machinesmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2022-28810matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2020-8657matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2024-20439 · Cisco Smart License Utilitymatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

1840 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

hitachi energy foxman-un

Of the 5 records in this advisory that state one, this holds the highest EPSS percentile: 0.44936.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-3927.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.