vciy

CVE-2022-35939

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Out of bounds write in `scatter_nd` op in TensorFlow Lite

CVE-2022-359394 of 4 sources documented this
30

rank 30 = 0 + 25 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00566  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$22,600over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$22,600 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.8004932139359172 exposure x 0.00566 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00566EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementfallenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-09-17, 1458 days at 0.01, as of 2026-09-14. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

MicrosoftIvanti ConnectFortinetFortinet35939

This record is one instance of CWE-787, out-of-bounds write. The index holds 14893 prior instances of this class, 164 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M7 HIGHreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
What it costs
GitHub_MPartial confidentiality and integrity loss; complete availability lossreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running tensorflow? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality and integrity loss; complete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-787 Out-of-bounds Writereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-787: Integrity: Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Unexpected State[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchtensorflow 2.7.2; tensorflow 2.8.1; tensorflow 2.9.1receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.00566 · top 54% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes29 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected producttensorflowreceipt
Published rangesgoogle tensorflow >= 2.7.0 < 2.7.2; google tensorflow >= 2.8.0 < 2.8.1; google tensorflow >= 2.9.0 < 2.9.1; google tensorflow 2.10receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactiontensorflowCWE-787 out-of-bounds writeAvailability lossA:Hexploits CWE-787data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. The `ScatterNd` function takes an input argument that determines the indices of of the output tensor. An input index greater than the output tensor or less than zero will either write content at the wrong index or trigger a crash. We have patched the issue in GitHub commit b4d4b4cb019bd7240a52daa4ba61e3cc814f0384. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.10.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.9.1, TensorFlow 2.8.1, and TensorFlow 2.7.2, as these are also affected and still in supported range. There are no known workarounds for this issue. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-787
affected versions
google tensorflow >= 2.7.0 < 2.7.2; google tensorflow >= 2.8.0 < 2.8.1; google tensorflow >= 2.9.0 < 2.9.1; and 1 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 7 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

The CNA scored it 7 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

17 Sep 20220.0089
7 Mar 20235.5e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00139 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00422 · scoring model v2026.06.15
14 Sep 20260.00566
Show all 29 observations
17 Sep 20220.0089
21 Sep 20220.00954
7 Mar 20235.5e-4
8 Mar 20230.00055
17 Aug 20230.00063
23 Sep 20230.00114
19 Oct 20230.00128
27 Feb 20240.00133
8 Apr 20240.00135
7 May 20240.00143
17 Mar 20250.00139
19 Mar 20250.00152
29 Mar 20250.00484
30 Mar 20250.00152
11 Jun 20250.0019
13 Jul 20250.00202
17 Sep 20250.00274
18 Sep 20250.00374
19 Oct 20250.00372
18 Nov 20250.00321
21 Nov 20250.00372
2 Dec 20250.00219
12 Mar 20260.00231
15 Jun 20260.00422
27 Jun 20260.00441
17 Jul 20260.00458
22 Aug 20260.00467
31 Aug 20260.00471
14 Sep 20260.00566

29 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00566Published2022-09-16Index as of2026-09-14

The record had been public for 3 years, 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-09-16 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-14 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-787, out-of-bounds write. The index holds 14893 prior instances of this class, 164 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2020-0878 · Microsoft ChakraCorematches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2025-0282 · Ivanti Connect Securematches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-22457 · Ivanti Connect Securematches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-21762 · Fortinet FortiProxymatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2022-42475 · Fortinet FortiProxymatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-27997 · Fortinet FortiOS-6K7Kmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

14893 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-35939.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.