vciy

CVE-2022-30597

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A flaw was found in moodle where the description user field was not hidden when being set as a hidden user field.

CVE-2022-305974 of 4 sources documented this
20

rank 20 = 0 + 13 + 0 + 7 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01343  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 7

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

8 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$16,100over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$16,100 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.01343 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01343EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-05-19, 1581 days at 0.01, as of 2026-09-16. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running moodle? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-472 External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameterreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-472: Integrity: Modify Application Data[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchmoodle 3.10.11; moodle 3.11.7; moodle 3.9.14receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.01343 · top 30% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth3 products across 3 vendorsderived
Assigned byfedorareceipt
Recorded changes37 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productmoodlereceipt
Published rangesmoodle >= 3.9 < 3.9.14; moodle >= 3.10 < 3.10.11; moodle >= 3.11 < 3.11.7; moodle 4.0.0receipt
Show all 8 published ranges
moodle >= 3.9 < 3.9.14
moodle >= 3.10 < 3.10.11
moodle >= 3.11 < 3.11.7
moodle 4.0.0
redhat enterprise linux 8.0
fedoraproject fedora 34
fedoraproject fedora 35
fedoraproject fedora 36

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A flaw was found in moodle where the description user field was not hidden when being set as a hidden user field. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-472
affected versions
moodle >= 3.9 < 3.9.14; moodle >= 3.10 < 3.10.11; moodle >= 3.11 < 3.11.7; and 5 more, listed in full below

check it yourself moodle.org bugzilla.redhat.com git.moodle.org lists.fedoraproject.org lists.fedoraproject.org lists.fedoraproject.org receipt

Movement the material steps

19 May 20220.0089
7 Mar 20235.9e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00217 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.01213 · scoring model v2026.06.15
16 Sep 20260.01343
Show all 37 observations
19 May 20220.0089
27 May 20220.01108
7 Mar 20235.9e-4
8 Mar 20230.00059
18 Apr 20230.00068
25 May 20230.00075
20 Jun 20230.00081
23 Aug 20230.00098
29 Oct 20230.00116
8 Nov 20230.00141
9 Dec 20230.00148
26 Nov 20240.00165
17 Dec 20240.00132
22 Dec 20240.00156
31 Jan 20250.00178
17 Mar 20250.00217
29 Mar 20250.00304
30 Mar 20250.00217
27 May 20250.00228
28 May 20250.00255
5 Jun 20250.0031
14 Jun 20250.00439
6 Jul 20250.00533
28 Jul 20250.0053
30 Jul 20250.00567
1 Oct 20250.0053
27 Oct 20250.00567
28 Oct 20250.0053
18 Nov 20250.00635
21 Nov 20250.0053
27 Dec 20250.00567
28 Dec 20250.0053
24 Feb 20260.00471
15 Jun 20260.01213
12 Jul 20260.01239
4 Aug 20260.01311
16 Sep 20260.01343

37 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01343Published2022-05-18Index as of2026-09-16

The record had been public for 4 years, 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-05-18 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-16 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-30597.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.