vciy

CVE-2022-29885

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

EncryptInterceptor does not provide complete protection on insecure networks

CVE-2022-298854 of 4 sources documented this
54

rank 54 = 26 + 19 + 2 + 7 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.73474  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-10-04  ·  without this subject the record ranks 52

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

7 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 47

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 54

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$2.24Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$421,000on 2026-03-04, the last material move, 4 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$2.24M = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.73474 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.73474EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.5 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 44 days at 0.73, as of 2026-07-29. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2023-44487SolarWinds Serv-UMicrosoft .NETCVE-2004-1464Cisco IOS XR29885

This record is one instance of CWE-400, uncontrolled resource consumption. The index holds 3763 prior instances of this class, 8 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Apache Tomcat? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumptionreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-400: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Resource Consumption (Other)…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 29 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories, 2022-06-30.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories2022-06-30receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.73474 · top 0.56% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth3 products across 3 vendorsderived
Assigned byapachereceipt
Recorded changes69 · last 18 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productApache Software Foundation Apache Tomcatreceipt
Published rangesapache tomcat >= 8.5.38 <= 8.5.78; apache tomcat >= 9.0.13 <= 9.0.62; apache tomcat >= 10.0.0 <= 10.0.20; apache tomcat 10.1.0receipt
Show all 7 published ranges
apache tomcat >= 8.5.38 <= 8.5.78
apache tomcat >= 9.0.13 <= 9.0.62
apache tomcat >= 10.0.0 <= 10.0.20
apache tomcat 10.1.0
debian linux 10.0
debian linux 11.0
oracle hospitality cruise shipboard property management system 20.2.1

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

The documentation of Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M14, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.20, 9.0.13 to 9.0.62 and 8.5.38 to 8.5.78 for the EncryptInterceptor incorrectly stated it enabled Tomcat clustering to run over an untrusted network. This was not correct. While the EncryptInterceptor does provide confidentiality and integrity protection, it does not protect against all risks associated with running over any untrusted network, particularly DoS risks. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-400
affected versions
apache tomcat >= 8.5.38 <= 8.5.78; apache tomcat >= 9.0.13 <= 9.0.62; apache tomcat >= 10.0.0 <= 10.0.20; and 4 more, listed in full below

check it yourself lists.apache.org oracle.com security.netapp.com lists.debian.org debian.org packetstormsecurity.com receipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.09 to 0.002025-03-17EPSS moved 0.09 to 0.672026-06-15EPSS moved 0.56 to 0.72

Movement the material steps

12 May 20220.00885
7 Mar 20230.00285 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.66722 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
19 Mar 20250.5261
20 Mar 20250.66722
23 Mar 20250.5261
24 Mar 20250.66722
27 Mar 20250.5261
28 Mar 20250.66722
1 May 20250.54086
4 May 20250.66722
1 Jun 20250.53386
4 Jun 20250.66148
1 Jul 20250.53386
4 Jul 20250.66148
1 Aug 20250.51658
4 Aug 20250.64713
1 Sep 20250.51658
4 Sep 20250.64713
1 Nov 20250.46344 · crossed 0.50
4 Nov 20250.60112 · crossed 0.50
18 Nov 20250.81886
21 Nov 20250.60112
1 Dec 20250.46344 · crossed 0.50
4 Dec 20250.60112 · crossed 0.50
1 Jan 20260.46344 · crossed 0.50
4 Jan 20260.60112 · crossed 0.50
1 Feb 20260.46344 · crossed 0.50
4 Feb 20260.60112 · crossed 0.50
1 Mar 20260.46344 · crossed 0.50
4 Mar 20260.60112 · crossed 0.50
15 Jun 20260.71653 · scoring model v2026.06.15
29 Jul 20260.73474

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 66 observations
12 May 20220.00885
1 Jul 20220.04499
26 Jul 20220.05736
27 Oct 20220.08663
7 Mar 20230.00285
6 Apr 20230.01169
7 Apr 20230.01481
19 May 20230.02993
14 Jun 20230.03165
23 Oct 20230.03732
20 Nov 20230.04507
3 Dec 20230.05259
18 Dec 20230.04677
1 Jan 20240.03898
29 Feb 20240.04220
10 Apr 20240.03022
7 Jun 20240.02875
16 Dec 20240.03272
17 Dec 20240.07019
25 Jan 20250.08539
17 Mar 20250.66722
19 Mar 20250.5261
20 Mar 20250.66722
23 Mar 20250.5261
24 Mar 20250.66722
27 Mar 20250.5261
28 Mar 20250.66722
29 Mar 20250.58812
30 Mar 20250.66722
1 May 20250.54086
4 May 20250.66722
11 May 20250.66148
1 Jun 20250.53386
4 Jun 20250.66148
1 Jul 20250.53386
4 Jul 20250.66148
17 Jul 20250.64713
1 Aug 20250.51658
4 Aug 20250.64713
15 Aug 20250.65196
28 Aug 20250.64713
1 Sep 20250.51658
4 Sep 20250.64713
12 Sep 20250.6581
30 Sep 20250.67374
1 Oct 20250.56569
4 Oct 20250.68719
19 Oct 20250.65695
20 Oct 20250.60112
1 Nov 20250.46344
4 Nov 20250.60112
18 Nov 20250.81886
21 Nov 20250.60112
1 Dec 20250.46344
4 Dec 20250.60112
1 Jan 20260.46344
4 Jan 20260.60112
1 Feb 20260.46344
4 Feb 20260.60112
1 Mar 20260.46344
4 Mar 20260.60112
28 Mar 20260.58505
10 Apr 20260.55532
15 Jun 20260.71653
6 Jul 20260.73139
29 Jul 20260.73474

66 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.73474Published2022-05-12Public PoC2022-06-30Index as of2026-07-29

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2024-12-16 and 2024-12-17 (0.03272 → 0.07019) and the record had been public for 4 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-05-12 receipt · Public PoC 2022-06-30 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-29 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-400, uncontrolled resource consumption. The index holds 3763 prior instances of this class, 8 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-44487matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2026-28318 · SolarWinds Serv-Umatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2023-38180 · Microsoft .NET 6.0matches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2004-1464matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2005receipt
CVE-2020-3566 · Cisco IOS XR Softwarematches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2020-3569 · Cisco IOS XR Softwarematches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3763 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

apache software foundation apache tomcat

Of the 6 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest EPSS percentile: 0.99427.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-29885.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.