vciy

CVE-2022-29247

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere in Electron

CVE-2022-292474 of 4 sources documented this
31

rank 31 = 0 + 25 + 0 + 6 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01027  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 6

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

6 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$12,300over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$171,000on 2023-01-18, the last material move, 3 years, 7 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$12,300 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.01027 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01027EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity2.2 LOWreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementfallenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-01-18, 1320 days at 0.01, as of 2026-08-30. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M2.2 LOWreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
What it costs
GitHub_MPartial confidentiality lossreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running electron? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-668 Exposure of Resource to Wrong Spherereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-668: Confidentiality: Read Application Data; Integrity: Modify Application Data; Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchelectron 15.5.5; electron 16.2.6; electron 17.2.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA2.2 LOWreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.01027 · top 38% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes33 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productelectronreceipt
Published rangeselectronjs electron < 15.5.5; electronjs electron >= 16.0.1 < 16.2.6; electronjs electron >= 17.0.1 < 17.2.0; electronjs electron 16.0.0receipt
Show all 6 published ranges
electronjs electron < 15.5.5
electronjs electron >= 16.0.1 < 16.2.6
electronjs electron >= 17.0.1 < 17.2.0
electronjs electron 16.0.0
electronjs electron 17.0.0
electronjs electron 18.0.0

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript (JS), HTML, and CSS. A vulnerability in versions prior to 18.0.0-beta.6, 17.2.0, 16.2.6, and 15.5.5 allows a renderer with JS execution to obtain access to a new renderer process with `nodeIntegrationInSubFrames` enabled which in turn allows effective access to `ipcRenderer`. The `nodeIntegrationInSubFrames` option does not implicitly grant Node.js access. Rather, it depends on the existing sandbox setting. If an application is sandboxed, then `nodeIntegrationInSubFrames` just gives access to the sandboxed renderer APIs, which include `ipcRenderer`. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

If the application then additionally exposes IPC messages without IPC `senderFrame` validation that perform privileged actions or return confidential data this access to `ipcRenderer` can in turn compromise your application / user even with the sandbox enabled. Electron versions 18.0.0-beta.6, 17.2.0, 16.2.6, and 15.5.5 contain a fix for this issue. As a workaround, ensure that all IPC message handlers appropriately validate `senderFrame`.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-668
affected versions
electronjs electron < 15.5.5; electronjs electron >= 16.0.1 < 16.2.6; electronjs electron >= 17.0.1 < 17.2.0; and 3 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 2.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

The CNA scored it 2.2 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com receipt

Dated events

2022-08-17EPSS moved 0.01 to 0.152023-01-18EPSS moved 0.15 to 0.01

Movement the material steps

14 Jun 20220.02559
17 Aug 20220.15362 · crossed 0.10
18 Jan 20230.01086 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.00134 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00107 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00945 · scoring model v2026.06.15
30 Aug 20260.01027
Show all 33 observations
14 Jun 20220.02559
28 Jun 20220.01086
17 Aug 20220.15362
18 Jan 20230.01086
7 Mar 20230.00134
14 May 20230.00156
20 Jun 20230.00251
16 Jul 20230.00249
24 Nov 20230.00280
4 Jan 20240.00261
17 Dec 20240.00251
17 Jan 20250.00260
26 Feb 20250.00278
17 Mar 20250.00107
19 Mar 20250.00137
29 Mar 20250.00526
30 Mar 20250.00137
9 Apr 20250.00146
15 Jun 20250.00153
17 Jun 20250.00172
1 Jul 20250.002
8 Jul 20250.00388
13 Aug 20250.0039
15 Aug 20250.00388
18 Nov 20250.00762
21 Nov 20250.00388
7 Dec 20250.00409
13 Dec 20250.00803
15 Jun 20260.00945
30 Jun 20260.00968
2 Jul 20260.00976
7 Aug 20260.00997
30 Aug 20260.01027

33 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01027Published2022-06-13Index as of2026-08-30

The record had been public for 4 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-06-13 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-30 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

electron

Of the 7 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest NVD CVSS score: 9.8.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-29247.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.