vciy

CVE-2022-29191

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Missing validation causes denial of service via `GetSessionTensor` in TensorFlow

CVE-2022-291914 of 4 sources documented this
19

rank 19 = 0 + 14 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00353  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$10,800over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$10,800 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.00353 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00353EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementfallenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-05-21, 1563 days at 0.00, as of 2026-08-31. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2015-2291Microsoft WindowsActiveMQ BrokerCVE-2022-47966CVE-2022-29499VMware vCenter29191

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running tensorflow? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-20 Improper Input Validationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-20: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Confidentiality: Read Memory, Read Files or Directories…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchtensorflow 2.6.4; tensorflow 2.7.2; tensorflow 2.8.1receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00353 · top 71% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes25 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected producttensorflowreceipt
Published rangesgoogle tensorflow < 2.6.4; google tensorflow >= 2.7.0 < 2.7.2; google tensorflow >= 2.8.0 < 2.8.1; google tensorflow 2.9.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessrequires low privilegestensorflowCWE-20 improper input validationAvailability lossA:Hexploits CWE-20data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. Prior to versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4, the implementation of `tf.raw_ops.GetSessionTensor` does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a `CHECK`-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack. Versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4 contain a patch for this issue. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-20
affected versions
google tensorflow < 2.6.4; google tensorflow >= 2.7.0 < 2.7.2; google tensorflow >= 2.8.0 < 2.8.1; and 1 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com github.com github.com github.com +1 morereceipt

Movement the material steps

21 May 20220.01034
7 Mar 20234.2e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00145 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.0035 · scoring model v2026.06.15
31 Aug 20260.00353
Show all 25 observations
21 May 20220.01034
7 Mar 20234.2e-4
8 Mar 20230.00042
25 Aug 20230.00044
11 Dec 20230.00051
26 Dec 20230.00063
9 Jan 20240.00076
11 Aug 20240.00098
17 Dec 20240.00108
17 Mar 20250.00145
29 Mar 20250.00272
30 Mar 20250.00145
17 Apr 20250.00189
21 May 20250.00156
23 May 20250.00175
25 May 20250.0016
3 Jun 20250.00098
1 Jul 20250.00113
27 Jul 20250.00072
18 Nov 20250.00056
21 Nov 20250.00072
28 Dec 20250.00113
18 Apr 20260.00143
15 Jun 20260.0035
31 Aug 20260.00353

25 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00353Published2022-05-20Index as of2026-08-31

The record had been public for 4 years, 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-05-20 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-31 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2015-2291matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2025-32706 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2026-34197 · Apache ActiveMQ Brokermatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2022-47966matches 4 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-29499matches 4 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-21985 · VMware vCenter Server and VMware Cloud…matches 4 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

13347 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Announced with 22 others

This record was published as one of 23 that cite a single advisory. The batch page names that advisory, counts what the group offers, and says what it does not cover.

Listed for shared announcement, not shared vulnerability. Each record here is its own finding with its own page, and fixing one does not address another.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-29191.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.