vciy

CVE-2022-26414

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A potential buffer overflow vulnerability was identified in some internal functions of Zyxel VMG3312-T20A firmware version 5.30(ABFX.5)C0, which…

CVE-2022-264144 of 4 sources documented this
24

rank 24 = 0 + 14 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00208  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$9,150over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$9,150 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.8814887365328109 exposure x 0.00208 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00208EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity6 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementfallenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-04-12, 1602 days at 0.00, as of 2026-08-31. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2016-0099CVE-2004-0210Apple iOSZyxel ATP seriesCVE-2018-678926414

This record is one instance of CWE-120, buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow'). The index holds 4490 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Zyxel6 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
What it costs
ZyxelComplete integrity and availability lossreceipt
NVDComplete availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Zyxel VMG3312-T20A firmware? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · high privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-120: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Availability: Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchemg3525-t50b firmware 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0; emg5523-t50b firmware 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0; emg5723-t50k firmware 5.50\(abom.7\)c0; emg6726-b10a firmware 5.13\(abnp.7\)c0; vmg1312-t20b firmware 5.50\(absb.5\)c0…receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA6 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00208 · top 89% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth20 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byZyxelreceipt
Recorded changes16 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productZyxel VMG3312-T20A firmwarereceipt
Published rangeszyxel vmg3312-t20a firmware 5.30\(abfx.5\)c0; zyxel emg3525-t50b firmware < 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0; zyxel emg5523-t50b firmware < 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0; zyxel emg5723-t50k firmware < 5.50\(abom.7\)c0receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
zyxel vmg3312-t20a firmware 5.30\(abfx.5\)c0
zyxel emg3525-t50b firmware < 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0
zyxel emg5523-t50b firmware < 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0
zyxel emg5723-t50k firmware < 5.50\(abom.7\)c0
zyxel emg6726-b10a firmware < 5.13\(abnp.7\)c0
zyxel vmg1312-t20b firmware < 5.50\(absb.5\)c0
zyxel vmg3625-t50b firmware < 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0
zyxel vmg3927-b50a firmware < 5.17\(abmt.6\)c0
zyxel vmg3927-b50b firmware < 5.13\(ably.7\)c0
zyxel vmg3927-b60a firmware < 5.17\(abmt.6\)c0
zyxel vmg3927-t50k firmware < 5.50\(abom.7\)c0
zyxel vmg4927-b50a firmware < 5.13\(ably.7\)c0
zyxel vmg8623-t50b firmware < 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0
zyxel vmg8825-b50a firmware < 5.17\(abmt.6\)c0
zyxel vmg8825-b50b firmware < 5.17\(abny.7\)c0
zyxel vmg8825-t50k firmware < 5.50\(abom.7\)c0
zyxel vmg8825-b60a firmware < 5.17\(abmt.6\)c0
zyxel vmg8825-b60b firmware < 5.17\(abny.7\)c0
zyxel xmg3927-b50a firmware < 5.17\(abmt.6\)c0
zyxel xmg8825-b50a firmware < 5.17\(abmt.6\)c0

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessrequires high privilegesZyxel VMG3312-T20A firmwareCWE-120 weaknessIntegrity and availability lossI:H / A:Hexploits CWE-120data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

A potential buffer overflow vulnerability was identified in some internal functions of Zyxel VMG3312-T20A firmware version 5.30(ABFX.5)C0, which could be exploited by a local authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-120
affected versions
zyxel vmg3312-t20a firmware 5.30\(abfx.5\)c0; zyxel emg3525-t50b firmware < 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0; zyxel emg5523-t50b firmware < 5.50\(abpm.6\)c0; and 17 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 6 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

The CNA scored it 6 and NVD 5.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself zyxel.com receipt

Movement the material steps

12 Apr 20220.00885
7 Mar 20234.2e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00039 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.002 · scoring model v2026.06.15
31 Aug 20260.00208
Show all 16 observations
12 Apr 20220.00885
7 Mar 20234.2e-4
8 Mar 20230.00042
17 Mar 20250.00039
19 Mar 20250.00048
29 Mar 20250.00047
30 Mar 20250.00048
12 Apr 20250.00039
29 Apr 20250.00045
15 May 20250.00039
16 May 20250.00043
30 Jun 20250.00134
1 Jul 20250.00038
15 Jun 20260.002
10 Aug 20260.00205
31 Aug 20260.00208

16 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00208Published2022-04-11Index as of2026-08-31

The record had been public for 4 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-04-11 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-31 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-120, buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow'). The index holds 4490 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2016-0099matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2004-0210matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2004receipt
CVE-2025-43520 · Apple iOS and iPadOSmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-33009 · Zyxel ATP series firmwarematches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-33010 · Zyxel ATP series firmwarematches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2018-6789matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

4490 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-26414.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.