vciy

CVE-2022-23123

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Netatalk

CVE-2022-231234 of 4 sources documented this
31

rank 31 = 1 + 25 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.03848  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 6

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

3 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$46,200over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$84,900on 2025-03-30, the last material move, 1 year, 2 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$46,200 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.03848 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.03848EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-03-17, 463 days at 0.04, as of 2026-06-23. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2014-0160CVE-2016-4523Apple macOSApple SafariESXiMicrosoft Windows23123

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Zdi5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Scoring standard
ZdiCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt
What it costs
ZdiPartial confidentiality lossreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Netatalk? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-125 Out-of-bounds Readreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-125: Confidentiality: Read Memory; Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchnetatalk 3.1.13receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.03848 · top 10% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 2 vendorsderived
Assigned byzdireceipt
Recorded changes52 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productNetatalkreceipt
Published rangesnetatalk < 3.1.13; debian linux 10.0; debian linux 11.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Netatalk. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the getdirparams method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-15830. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-125
affected versions
netatalk < 3.1.13; debian linux 10.0; debian linux 11.0

The CNA scored it 5.3 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself netatalk.sourceforge.io zerodayinitiative.com lists.debian.org lists.debian.org debian.org security.gentoo.org receipt

Dated events

2024-12-17EPSS moved 0.09 to 0.452025-03-17EPSS moved 0.63 to 0.042025-03-30EPSS moved 0.11 to 0.04

Movement the material steps

29 Mar 20230.00176
17 Dec 20240.44826 · crossed 0.10
14 Jan 20250.57628 · crossed 0.50
17 Mar 20250.04416 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
24 Mar 20250.11491 · crossed 0.10
25 Mar 20250.04416 · crossed 0.10
27 Mar 20250.11491 · crossed 0.10
28 Mar 20250.04416 · crossed 0.10
29 Mar 20250.11491 · crossed 0.10
30 Mar 20250.04416 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.03817 · scoring model v2026.06.15
23 Jun 20260.03848

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 52 observations
29 Mar 20230.00176
4 Apr 20230.01334
7 May 20230.01881
17 May 20230.00961
10 Jun 20230.01334
5 Jul 20230.01376
14 Aug 20230.01417
8 Sep 20230.01439
22 Sep 20230.02421
2 Nov 20230.02080
23 Nov 20230.01227
25 Nov 20230.01468
10 Jan 20240.01819
15 Feb 20240.02009
26 Feb 20240.01783
9 Mar 20240.01677
3 Apr 20240.02490
29 Apr 20240.02561
2 Jul 20240.02836
7 Sep 20240.04499
18 Oct 20240.04521
2 Nov 20240.05290
16 Nov 20240.09190
17 Dec 20240.44826
30 Dec 20240.42302
14 Jan 20250.57628
28 Jan 20250.62519
17 Mar 20250.04416
24 Mar 20250.11491
25 Mar 20250.04416
27 Mar 20250.11491
28 Mar 20250.04416
29 Mar 20250.11491
30 Mar 20250.04416
15 Apr 20250.03503
12 May 20250.02708
20 Sep 20250.02443
1 Oct 20250.02889
27 Oct 20250.02443
28 Oct 20250.02889
5 Nov 20250.05278
6 Nov 20250.05678
18 Nov 20250.05785
21 Nov 20250.05054
21 Dec 20250.0606
27 Dec 20250.0516
28 Dec 20250.0606
22 Jan 20260.07824
15 Apr 20260.08946
13 May 20260.07661
15 Jun 20260.03817
23 Jun 20260.03848

52 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.03848Published2023-03-28Index as of2026-06-23

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-25 and 2025-03-27 (0.04416 → 0.11491) and the record had been public for 3 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2023-03-28 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-23 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2014-0160matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2014receipt
CVE-2016-4523matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2023-28204 · Apple macOSmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-42916 · Apple Safarimatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2025-22226 · ESXimatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-24991 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

9767 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

netatalk

Of the 5 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest EPSS percentile: 0.89411.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-23123.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.