vciy

CVE-2022-22176

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Junos OS: In a scenario with dhcp-security and option-82 configured jdhcpd crashes upon receipt of a malformed DHCP packet

CVE-2022-221764 of 4 sources documented this
26

rank 26 = 0 + 16 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00368  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$11,200over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$11,200 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.00368 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00368EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.4 HIGHreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-02-08, 1588 days at 0.00, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Juniper7.4 HIGHreceipt
NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
What it costs
JuniperComplete availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Juniper Networks Junos OS? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachreachable from an adjacent network · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-1286 Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Inputreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-1286: Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in15.1R7-S11; 18.3R3-S6; 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S10; 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2R1-S8, 19.2R3-S4; 19.3R2-S7, 19.3R3-S4; 19.4R3-S6; 20.1R3-S3; 20.2R3-S3; 20.3R3-S1…receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.4 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00368 · top 69% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byjuniperreceipt
Recorded changes10 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productJuniper Networks Junos OSreceipt
Published rangesjuniper junos 13.2; juniper junos 13.2x51; juniper junos 13.2x52; juniper junos 13.3receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
juniper junos 13.2
juniper junos 13.2x51
juniper junos 13.2x52
juniper junos 13.3
juniper junos 13.3r9
juniper junos 14.1
juniper junos 14.1r7
juniper junos 14.1x50
juniper junos 14.1x51
juniper junos 14.1x53
juniper junos 14.1x53-d10
juniper junos 14.1x53-d15
juniper junos 14.1x53-d25
juniper junos 14.1x53-d26
juniper junos 14.1x53-d27
juniper junos 14.1x53-d30
juniper junos 14.1x53-d35
juniper junos 14.1x55
juniper junos 14.2
juniper junos 14.2r6
Fixed in15.1R7-S11; 18.3R3-S6; 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S10; 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2R1-S8, 19.2R3-S4; 19.3R2-S7, 19.3R3-S4; 19.4R3-S6; 20.1R3-S3; 20.2R3-S3; 20.3R3-S1…receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Adjacent networkno credentials, no interactionJuniper Networks Junos OSCWE-1286 weaknessAdjacent componentsscope changeAvailability lossA:Hexploits CWE-1286scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Juniper DHCP daemon (jdhcpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker sending a malformed DHCP packet to cause a crash of jdhcpd and thereby a Denial of Service (DoS). If option-82 is configured in a DHCP snooping / -security scenario, jdhcpd crashes if a specific malformed DHCP request packet is received. The DHCP functionality is impacted while jdhcpd restarts, and continued exploitation of the vulnerability will lead to the unavailability of the DHCP service and thereby a sustained DoS. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS 13.2 version 13.2R1 and later versions prior to 15.1R7-S11; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S6; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S10; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S8, 19.2R3-S4; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S7, 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S6; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S1; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R2-S1, 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R1-S1, 21.2R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS version 12.3R12 and prior versions.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-1286; CWE-20
affected versions
juniper junos 13.2; juniper junos 13.2x51; juniper junos 13.2x52; and 17 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 7.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

The CNA scored it 7.4 and NVD 6.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself kb.juniper.net receipt

Movement the material steps

8 Feb 20220.00885
7 Mar 20234.9e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00078 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00368 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 10 observations
8 Feb 20220.00885
7 Mar 20234.9e-4
8 Mar 20230.00049
1 Jul 20230.00054
18 Aug 20240.00055
4 Oct 20240.00062
17 Mar 20250.00078
29 Mar 20250.00106
30 Mar 20250.00078
15 Jun 20260.00368

10 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00368Published2022-01-19Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 4 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-01-19 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

juniper networks junos os

Of the 10 records in this family, this is the only one holding a stated fix version: 15.1R7-S11; 18.3R3-S6; 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S10; 19.1R2-S3, 19..

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-22176.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.