vciy

CVE-2022-1354

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in Libtiffs' tiffinfo.c in TIFFReadRawDataStriped() function

CVE-2022-13544 of 4 sources documented this
21

rank 21 = 0 + 14 + 0 + 7 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00556  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 7

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

7 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$17,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$17,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.00556 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00556EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementfallenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-09-01, 1462 days at 0.01, as of 2026-09-02. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2016-4523Google ChromeMicrosoft WindowsCVE-2016-1646polkit1354

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running libtiff? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · no privileges required · user interaction required · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-125 Out-of-bounds Readreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-125: Confidentiality: Read Memory; Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchlibtiff 4.4.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00556 · top 55% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth4 products across 4 vendorsderived
Assigned byredhatreceipt
Recorded changes45 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productlibtiffreceipt
Published rangeslibtiff < 4.4.0; fedoraproject fedora 34; fedoraproject fedora 35; fedoraproject fedora 36receipt
Show all 7 published ranges
libtiff < 4.4.0
fedoraproject fedora 34
fedoraproject fedora 35
fedoraproject fedora 36
redhat enterprise linux 9.0
debian linux 10.0
debian linux 11.0

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in Libtiffs' tiffinfo.c in TIFFReadRawDataStriped() function. This flaw allows an attacker to pass a crafted TIFF file to the tiffinfo tool, triggering a heap buffer overflow issue and causing a crash that leads to a denial of service. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-125; CWE-787
affected versions
libtiff < 4.4.0; fedoraproject fedora 34; fedoraproject fedora 35; and 4 more, listed in full below

check it yourself bugzilla.redhat.com gitlab.com gitlab.com access.redhat.com security.netapp.com security.gentoo.org +2 morereceipt

Movement the material steps

1 Sep 20220.0095
7 Mar 20234.2e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.0002 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00532 · scoring model v2026.06.15
2 Sep 20260.00556
Show all 45 observations
1 Sep 20220.0095
8 Sep 20220.01018
31 Oct 20220.01108
30 Jan 20230.01183
3 Feb 20230.01537
13 Feb 20230.01183
7 Mar 20234.2e-4
8 Mar 20230.00042
3 Oct 20230.00051
6 Dec 20230.00060
11 Feb 20240.00071
23 Mar 20240.00082
21 Apr 20240.00089
22 Nov 20240.00116
17 Dec 20240.00099
17 Mar 20250.0002
29 Mar 20250.0003
30 Mar 20250.0002
22 Jun 20250.00022
27 Jun 20250.00027
16 Jul 20250.00028
24 Jul 20250.00027
27 Aug 20250.00029
7 Sep 20250.0005
16 Sep 20250.00052
18 Sep 20250.0006
23 Sep 20250.00058
11 Oct 20250.00043
18 Nov 20250.0011
21 Nov 20250.00043
29 Nov 20250.00058
13 Dec 20250.00034
1 Jan 20260.00036
19 Jan 20260.00034
29 Jan 20260.00032
31 Jan 20260.00033
7 Feb 20260.00038
21 Apr 20260.00052
27 Apr 20260.00051
4 May 20260.00057
31 May 20260.00062
15 Jun 20260.00532
6 Aug 20260.00543
28 Aug 20260.0056
2 Sep 20260.00556

45 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00556Published2022-08-31Index as of2026-09-02

The record had been public for 4 years when this index was last written.

Published 2022-08-31 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-02 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2016-4523matches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2026-11645 · Google Chromematches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-24991 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-0519 · Google Chromematches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2016-1646matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2021-4034 · polkitmatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2022receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

9767 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-1354.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.