vciy

CVE-2022-0760

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Simple Link Directory < 7.7.2 - Unauthenticated SQL injection

CVE-2022-07604 of 4 sources documented this
31

rank 31 = 3 + 25 + 1 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.10825  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 6

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-10-07  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$540,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$256,000on 2025-03-30, the last material move, 1 year, 2 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$540,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.10825 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.10825EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.00885 to 0.10825 across 42 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2023-34362CVE-2021-42258CVE-2020-29574CVE-2017-18362FortinetProgress Software0760

This record is one instance of CWE-89, improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection'). The index holds 20889 prior instances of this class, 31 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Simple Link Directory? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-89: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Confidentiality: Read Application Data; Authentication: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in7.7.2receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.10825 · top 4% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byWPScanreceipt
Recorded changes42 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productSimple Link Directoryreceipt
Published rangesquantumcloud simple link directory < 7.7.2receipt
Fixed in7.7.2receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

The Simple Link Directory WordPress plugin before 7.7.2 does not validate and escape the post_id parameter before using it in a SQL statement via the qcopd_upvote_action AJAX action (available to unauthenticated and authenticated users), leading to an unauthenticated SQL Injection receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-89
affected versions
quantumcloud simple link directory < 7.7.2

check it yourself wpscan.com plugins.trac.wordpress.org receipt

Dated events

2024-12-17EPSS moved 0.03 to 0.092025-03-17EPSS moved 0.08 to 0.872026-06-15EPSS moved 0.76 to 0.11

Movement the material steps

22 Mar 20220.00885
7 Mar 20230.01121 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.8733 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
29 Mar 20250.92437 · crossed 0.90
30 Mar 20250.87313 · crossed 0.90
18 Nov 20250.73227
21 Nov 20250.85913
11 Mar 20260.71301
15 Jun 20260.10825 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 42 observations
22 Mar 20220.00885
7 Mar 20230.01121
28 Mar 20230.00879
23 Apr 20230.00979
13 Jun 20230.01100
1 Sep 20230.01279
14 Sep 20230.01398
29 Sep 20230.01710
12 Oct 20230.01617
10 Nov 20230.03399
22 Jan 20240.02788
18 Feb 20240.03107
17 Mar 20240.02705
16 Sep 20240.02934
25 Oct 20240.03050
4 Dec 20240.02835
17 Dec 20240.09440
18 Dec 20240.07221
10 Feb 20250.06704
9 Mar 20250.07517
17 Mar 20250.8733
19 Mar 20250.8869
20 Mar 20250.8733
22 Mar 20250.88041
23 Mar 20250.89266
24 Mar 20250.88041
27 Mar 20250.89266
28 Mar 20250.88041
29 Mar 20250.92437
30 Mar 20250.87313
12 Apr 20250.79355
21 May 20250.77716
22 Jul 20250.77442
7 Oct 20250.85913
18 Nov 20250.73227
21 Nov 20250.85913
18 Jan 20260.83869
30 Jan 20260.83897
10 Mar 20260.85935
11 Mar 20260.71301
22 May 20260.76425
15 Jun 20260.10825

42 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.10825Published2022-03-21Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 4 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-03-21 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-89, improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection'). The index holds 20889 prior instances of this class, 31 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-34362matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-42258matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2020-29574matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2017-18362matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2023-48788 · Fortinet FortiClientEMSmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-6670 · Progress Software Corporation WhatsUp Goldmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

20889 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-0760.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.