vciy

CVE-2022-0724

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information in microweber/microweber

CVE-2022-07244 of 4 sources documented this
18

rank 18 = 0 + 16 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01348  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$67,300over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$67,300 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.01348 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01348EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.1 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-02-24, 1602 days at 0.01, as of 2026-07-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
@huntrdev9.1 CRITICALreceipt
NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Scoring standard
@huntrdevCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt
What it costs
@huntrdevComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running microweber/microweber? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-922 Insecure Storage of Sensitive Informationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-922: Confidentiality: Read Application Data, Read Files or Directories; Integrity: Modify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in1.3receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA9.1 CRITICALreceipt
CVSS, NVD6.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.01348 · top 30% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned by@huntrdevreceipt
Recorded changes14 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productmicroweber/microweberreceipt
Published rangesmicroweber < 1.3receipt
Fixed in1.3receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires high privilegesmicroweber/microweberCWE-922 weaknessAdjacent componentsscope changeFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-922scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information in GitHub repository microweber/microweber prior to 1.3. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-922
affected versions
microweber < 1.3

The CNA scored it 9.1 and NVD 6.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself huntr.dev github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

24 Feb 20220.00885
7 Mar 20236.2e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00449 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.01327 · scoring model v2026.06.15
15 Jul 20260.01348
Show all 14 observations
24 Feb 20220.00885
7 Mar 20236.2e-4
8 Mar 20230.00062
16 Sep 20230.00070
17 Dec 20240.00075
15 Jan 20250.00073
17 Mar 20250.00449
19 Mar 20250.00491
29 Mar 20250.00755
30 Mar 20250.00491
6 Apr 20250.00431
19 Aug 20250.00455
15 Jun 20260.01327
15 Jul 20260.01348

14 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01348Published2022-02-23Index as of2026-07-15

The record had been public for 4 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-02-23 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-15 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-0724.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.