vciy

CVE-2022-0361

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Heap-based Buffer Overflow in vim/vim

CVE-2022-03614 of 4 sources documented this
25

rank 25 = 0 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01566  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$78,100over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$78,100 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.01566 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01566EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.4 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-02-08, 1596 days at 0.02, as of 2026-06-23. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2015-3113Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft WindowsFortinetLinux0361

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
@huntrdev8.4 HIGHreceipt
NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Scoring standard
@huntrdevCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running vim/vim? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflowreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-122: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Execute…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in8.2receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.4 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.01566 · top 26% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth3 products across 3 vendorsderived
Assigned by@huntrdevreceipt
Recorded changes34 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productvim/vimreceipt
Published rangesvim < 8.2.4215; debian linux 9.0; debian linux 10.0; apple macos >= 12.0 < 12.6receipt
Fixed in8.2receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessno credentials, no interactionvim/vimCWE-122 weaknessFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-122data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-122; CWE-787
affected versions
vim < 8.2.4215; debian linux 9.0; debian linux 10.0; and 1 more, listed in full below

The CNA scored it 8.4 and NVD 7.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself huntr.dev github.com lists.debian.org security.gentoo.org support.apple.com support.apple.com +4 morereceipt

Movement the material steps

8 Feb 20220.00885
7 Mar 20236.7e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00081 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.01573 · scoring model v2026.06.15
23 Jun 20260.01566
Show all 34 observations
8 Feb 20220.00885
12 Mar 20220.00954
21 Aug 20220.01018
28 Oct 20220.01108
31 Oct 20220.01537
7 Mar 20236.7e-4
8 Mar 20230.00067
3 May 20230.00078
19 Aug 20230.00081
3 Sep 20230.00082
17 Sep 20230.00089
17 Mar 20250.00081
29 Mar 20250.00428
30 Mar 20250.00081
2 Apr 20250.00078
7 Apr 20250.00083
20 Apr 20250.00081
10 May 20250.00074
18 May 20250.00064
23 May 20250.00076
24 May 20250.00081
29 May 20250.00086
5 Jun 20250.00083
16 Jun 20250.00079
5 Jul 20250.00102
22 Jul 20250.00108
26 Aug 20250.00111
11 Oct 20250.00102
4 Nov 20250.00118
18 Nov 20250.01503
21 Nov 20250.00118
8 May 20260.002
15 Jun 20260.01573
23 Jun 20260.01566

34 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01566Published2022-01-26Index as of2026-06-23

The record had been public for 4 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2022-01-26 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-23 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2015-3113matches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2015receipt
CVE-2024-30051 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-23376 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-27997 · Fortinet FortiOS-6K7Kmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-28252 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2026-53362 · Linuxmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3216 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2022-0361.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.