vciy

CVE-2021-41129

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Authentication bypass in Pterodactyl

CVE-2021-411294 of 4 sources documented this
19

rank 19 = 0 + 17 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01752  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 17

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$87,400over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$1.61Mon 2022-04-01, the last material move, 4 years, 3 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$87,400 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.01752 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01752EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.1 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-04-01, 1581 days at 0.02, as of 2026-07-30. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2023-43208CVE-2022-31199CVE-2021-35464CVE-2021-42237SonicWall SMA1000SolarWinds Web41129

This record is one instance of CWE-502, deserialization of untrusted data. The index holds 3288 prior instances of this class, 76 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M8.1 HIGHreceipt
NVD6.8 MEDIUMreceipt
Scoring standard
GitHub_MCVSS v3.1receipt
NVDCVSS v2.0receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running pterodactyl panel? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data; CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key; CWE-807 Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a…receipt
Published consequencesCWE-502: Integrity: Modify Application Data, Unexpected State; Availability: DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU); Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchpanel 1.6.2receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.1 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD6.8 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.01752 · top 23% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes23 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productpterodactyl panelreceipt
Published rangespterodactyl panel >= 1.0.0 < 1.6.2receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionpterodactyl panelCWE-502 deserialization of untrus…Full compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-502data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

Pterodactyl is an open-source game server management panel built with PHP 7, React, and Go. A malicious user can modify the contents of a `confirmation_token` input during the two-factor authentication process to reference a cache value not associated with the login attempt. In rare cases this can allow a malicious actor to authenticate as a random user in the Panel. The malicious user must target an account with two-factor authentication enabled, and then must provide a correct two-factor authentication token before being authenticated as that user. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

Due to a validation flaw in the logic handling user authentication during the two-factor authentication process a malicious user can trick the system into loading credentials for an arbitrary user by modifying the token sent to the server. This authentication flaw is present in the `LoginCheckpointController@__invoke` method which handles two-factor authentication for a user. This controller looks for a request input parameter called `confirmation_token` which is expected to be a 64 character random alpha-numeric string that references a value within the Panel's cache containing a `user_id` value. This value is then used to fetch the user that attempted to login, and lookup their two-factor authentication token. Due to the design of this system, any element in the cache that contains only digits could be referenced by a malicious user, and whatever value is stored at that position would be used as the `user_id`. There are a few different areas of the Panel that store values into the cache that are integers, and a user who determines what those cache keys are could pass one of those keys which would cause this code pathway to reference an arbitrary user. At its heart this is a high-risk login bypass vulnerability. However, there are a few additional conditions that must be met in order for this to be successfully executed, notably: 1.) The account referenced by the malicious cache key must have two-factor authentication enabled. An account without two-factor authentication would cause an exception to be triggered by the authentication logic, thusly exiting this authentication flow. 2.) Even if the malicious user is able to reference a valid cache key that references a valid user account with two-factor authentication, they must provide a valid two-factor authentication token. However, due to the design of this endpoint once a valid user account is found with two-factor authentication enabled there is no rate-limiting present, thusly allowing an attacker to brute force combinations until successful. This leads to a third condition that must be met: 3.) For the duration of this attack sequence the cache key being referenced must continue to exist with a valid `user_id` value. Depending on the specific key being used for this attack, this value may disappear quickly, or be changed by other random user interactions on the Panel, outside the control of the attacker. In order to mitigate this vulnerability the underlying authentication logic was changed to use an encrypted session store that the user is therefore unable to control the value of. This completely removed the use of a user-controlled value being used. In addition, the code was audited to ensure this type of vulnerability is not present elsewhere.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
6.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
weakness
CWE-502; CWE-639; CWE-807; CWE-287
affected versions
pterodactyl panel >= 1.0.0 < 1.6.2
also scored by
[email protected] 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The CNA scored it 8.1 and NVD 6.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself github.com github.com github.com github.com receipt

Dated events

2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.05 to 0.332022-04-01EPSS moved 0.33 to 0.01

Movement the material steps

7 Oct 20210.0104
4 Feb 20220.33364 · crossed 0.10
1 Apr 20220.01018 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.00124 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00468 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.01696 · scoring model v2026.06.15
30 Jul 20260.01752
Show all 23 observations
7 Oct 20210.0104
6 Jan 20220.04504
4 Feb 20220.33364
1 Apr 20220.01018
7 Mar 20230.00124
19 Mar 20230.00136
14 May 20230.00134
28 May 20230.00131
12 May 20240.00183
21 Jun 20240.00202
24 Sep 20240.00184
17 Dec 20240.00130
17 Mar 20250.00468
29 Mar 20250.00908
30 Mar 20250.00468
1 Apr 20250.00446
17 Aug 20250.00432
12 Sep 20250.00193
18 Nov 20250.00432
21 Nov 20250.00193
27 Feb 20260.00261
15 Jun 20260.01696
30 Jul 20260.01752

23 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01752Published2021-10-06Index as of2026-07-30

The record had been public for 4 years, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2021-10-06 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-30 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-502, deserialization of untrusted data. The index holds 3288 prior instances of this class, 76 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-43208matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-31199matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-35464matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-42237matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2025-23006 · SonicWall SMA1000matches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-26399 · SolarWinds Web Help Deskmatches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3288 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2021-41129.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.