vciy

CVE-2021-39135

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following in @npmcli/arborist

CVE-2021-391354 of 4 sources documented this
25

rank 25 = 0 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00553  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$24,300over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$24,300 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.8814887365328109 exposure x 0.00553 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00553EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.2 HIGHreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementsteadyreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-09-01, 1757 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-24. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
GitHub_M8.2 HIGHreceipt
NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
What it costs
GitHub_MComplete confidentiality and integrity loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running npm arborist? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · no privileges required · user interaction required · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality and integrity loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-61 UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Followingreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-61: Confidentiality, Integrity: Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by brancharborist 2.8.2; sinec infrastructure network services 1.0.1.1receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.2 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00553 · top 55% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth3 products across 3 vendorsderived
Assigned byGitHub_Mreceipt
Recorded changes21 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productnpm arboristreceipt
Published rangesnpmjs arborist < 2.8.2; oracle graalvm 20.3.3; oracle graalvm 21.2.0; siemens sinec infrastructure network services < 1.0.1.1receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessrequires user interactionnpm arboristCWE-61 weaknessAdjacent componentsscope changeConfidentiality and integrity lossC:H / I:Hexploits CWE-61scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

`@npmcli/arborist`, the library that calculates dependency trees and manages the node_modules folder hierarchy for the npm command line interface, aims to guarantee that package dependency contracts will be met, and the extraction of package contents will always be performed into the expected folder. This is accomplished by extracting package contents into a project's `node_modules` folder. If the `node_modules` folder of the root project or any of its dependencies is somehow replaced with a symbolic link, it could allow Arborist to write package dependencies to any arbitrary location on the file system. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

Note that symbolic links contained within package artifact contents are filtered out, so another means of creating a `node_modules` symbolic link would have to be employed. 1. A `preinstall` script could replace `node_modules` with a symlink. (This is prevented by using `--ignore-scripts`.) 2. An attacker could supply the target with a git repository, instructing them to run `npm install --ignore-scripts` in the root. This may be successful, because `npm install --ignore-scripts` is typically not capable of making changes outside of the project directory, so it may be deemed safe. This is patched in @npmcli/arborist 2.8.2 which is included in npm v7.20.7 and above. For more information including workarounds please see the referenced GHSA-gmw6-94gg-2rc2.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-61; CWE-59
affected versions
npmjs arborist < 2.8.2; oracle graalvm 20.3.3; oracle graalvm 21.2.0; and 1 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 8.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

The CNA scored it 8.2 and NVD 7.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself npmjs.com github.com oracle.com cert-portal.siemens.com receipt

Movement the material steps

1 Sep 20210.00624
7 Mar 20234.8e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00296 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00514 · scoring model v2026.06.15
24 Jun 20260.00553
Show all 21 observations
1 Sep 20210.00624
21 Oct 20210.00833
6 Jan 20220.0363
4 Feb 20220.01512
9 Mar 20220.01787
1 Apr 20220.01018
7 Mar 20234.8e-4
8 Mar 20230.00048
8 Apr 20230.00056
6 Apr 20240.00057
16 May 20240.00065
17 Dec 20240.00092
17 Mar 20250.00296
29 Mar 20250.00744
30 Mar 20250.00296
17 Jun 20250.00281
4 Aug 20250.00211
18 Nov 20250.011
21 Nov 20250.00211
15 Jun 20260.00514
24 Jun 20260.00553

21 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00553Published2021-08-31Index as of2026-06-24

The record had been public for 4 years, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2021-08-31 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-24 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

npm arborist

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2021-39135.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.