vciy

CVE-2021-34770

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Cisco IOS XE Software for Catalyst 9000 Family Wireless Controllers CAPWAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CVE-2021-347704 of 4 sources documented this
36

rank 36 = 1 + 25 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.02964  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 11

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 36

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 36

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$148,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$1.18Mon 2022-04-01, the last material move, 4 years, 3 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$148,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.02964 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.02964EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity10 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-04-01, 1568 days at 0.03, as of 2026-07-17. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2015-3113FortinetVMware vCenterGoogle ChromeFacebook WhatsAppFortinet34770

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Cisco10 CRITICALreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
What it costs
CiscoComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Cisco IOS XE Software? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflowreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-122: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Execute…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 17 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA10 CRITICALreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.02964 · top 13% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byciscoreceipt
Recorded changes25 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productCisco IOS XE Softwarereceipt
Published rangescisco ios xe 3.15.1xbs; cisco ios xe 3.15.2xbs; cisco ios xe 16.6.4s; cisco ios xe 16.10.1receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
cisco ios xe 3.15.1xbs
cisco ios xe 3.15.2xbs
cisco ios xe 16.6.4s
cisco ios xe 16.10.1
cisco ios xe 16.10.1e
cisco ios xe 16.10.1s
cisco ios xe 16.11.1
cisco ios xe 16.11.1a
cisco ios xe 16.11.1b
cisco ios xe 16.11.1c
cisco ios xe 16.11.2
cisco ios xe 16.12.1
cisco ios xe 16.12.1s
cisco ios xe 16.12.1t
cisco ios xe 16.12.2s
cisco ios xe 16.12.2t
cisco ios xe 16.12.3
cisco ios xe 16.12.3s
cisco ios xe 16.12.4
cisco ios xe 16.12.4a

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionCisco IOS XE SoftwareCWE-122 weaknessAdjacent componentsscope changeFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-122scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) protocol processing of Cisco IOS XE Software for Cisco Catalyst 9000 Family Wireless Controllers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with administrative privileges or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a logic error that occurs during the validation of CAPWAP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted CAPWAP packet to an affected device. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with administrative privileges or cause the affected device to crash and reload, resulting in a DoS condition.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-122; CWE-787
affected versions
cisco ios xe 3.15.1xbs; cisco ios xe 3.15.2xbs; cisco ios xe 16.6.4s; and 17 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 10 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

The CNA scored it 10 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself tools.cisco.com receipt

Dated events

2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.05 to 0.252022-04-01EPSS moved 0.25 to 0.01

Movement the material steps

23 Sep 20210.01142
4 Feb 20220.24737 · crossed 0.10
1 Apr 20220.01156 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20239.8e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00457 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.0287 · scoring model v2026.06.15
17 Jul 20260.02964

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 25 observations
23 Sep 20210.01142
6 Jan 20220.04927
4 Feb 20220.24737
1 Apr 20220.01156
7 Mar 20239.8e-4
8 Mar 20230.00098
15 Apr 20230.00113
30 Apr 20230.00118
7 Sep 20230.00123
15 Dec 20230.00183
17 Mar 20250.00457
19 Mar 20250.00943
29 Mar 20250.0192
30 Mar 20250.00943
30 Jul 20250.01056
1 Oct 20250.00943
27 Oct 20250.01056
28 Oct 20250.00943
31 Oct 20250.01029
18 Nov 20250.01419
21 Nov 20250.01029
27 Dec 20250.01152
28 Dec 20250.01029
15 Jun 20260.0287
17 Jul 20260.02964

25 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.02964Published2021-09-23Index as of2026-07-17

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-17 and 2025-03-19 (0.00457 → 0.00943) and the record had been public for 4 years, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2021-09-23 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-17 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2015-3113matches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2015receipt
CVE-2023-27997 · Fortinet FortiOS-6K7Kmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2024-38812 · VMware vCenter Servermatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2020-16010 · Google Chromematches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2019-3568 · Facebook WhatsApp for Androidmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2025-25249 · Fortinet FortiSwitchManagermatches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3216 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

cisco ios

Of the 4 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest NVD CVSS score: 9.8.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: computed, pro@dim2000

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2021-34770.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.