vciy

CVE-2021-3177

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python…

CVE-2021-31773 of 4 sources documented this
39

rank 39 = 6 + 25 + 0 + 8 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.23293  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 39

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

12 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 39

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$1.16Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$575,000on 2025-11-21, the last material move, 8 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$1.16M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.23293 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.23293EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 46 days at 0.23, as of 2026-07-31. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

SonicWall SonicOSCVE-2018-6789Zyxel ATP seriesCVE-2022-37055CVE-2020-150693177

This record is one instance of CWE-120, buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow'). The index holds 4490 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-120: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Availability: Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 31 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.23293 · top 2% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth8 products across 4 vendorsderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes65 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesPython; Fedoraproject fedora; Debian linux; and 5 morereceipt
Published rangespython >= 3.6.0 <= 3.6.12; python >= 3.7.0 <= 3.7.9; python >= 3.8.0 <= 3.8.7; python >= 3.9.0 <= 3.9.1receipt
Show all 12 published ranges
python >= 3.6.0 <= 3.6.12
python >= 3.7.0 <= 3.7.9
python >= 3.8.0 <= 3.8.7
python >= 3.9.0 <= 3.9.1
fedoraproject fedora 32
fedoraproject fedora 33
debian linux 9.0
oracle communications cloud native core network function cloud native environment 22.2.0
oracle communications offline mediation controller 12.0.0.3.0
oracle communications pricing design center 12.0.0.3.0
oracle enterprise manager ops center 12.4.0.0
oracle zfs storage appliance kit 8.8

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-120
affected versions
python >= 3.6.0 <= 3.6.12; python >= 3.7.0 <= 3.7.9; python >= 3.8.0 <= 3.8.7; and 9 more, listed in full below
also scored by
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself bugs.python.org github.com python-security.readthedocs.io lists.fedoraproject.org lists.fedoraproject.org security.gentoo.org +14 morereceipt

Dated events

2021-07-21EPSS moved 0.10 to 0.102022-04-01EPSS moved 0.70 to 0.112026-06-15EPSS moved 0.00 to 0.23

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.09782
21 Jul 20210.10167 · crossed 0.10
6 Jan 20220.34602
4 Feb 20220.70009 · crossed 0.50
1 Apr 20220.10667 · crossed 0.50
7 Mar 20230.00924 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00044 · scoring model v2025.03.14
18 Nov 20250.11566 · crossed 0.10
21 Nov 20250.00036 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.23293 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
31 Jul 20260.23293

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 65 observations
14 Apr 20210.09782
21 Jul 20210.10167
21 Oct 20210.10548
6 Jan 20220.34602
4 Feb 20220.70009
1 Apr 20220.10667
7 Mar 20230.00924
8 May 20230.01405
25 May 20230.01985
8 Jul 20230.01309
15 Jul 20230.01627
26 Aug 20230.01942
5 Oct 20230.02107
8 Nov 20230.04232
15 Nov 20230.05609
8 Jan 20240.04038
7 May 20240.03119
8 Jun 20240.03839
2 Sep 20240.03096
23 Nov 20240.04038
17 Dec 20240.02506
17 Mar 20250.00044
18 Mar 20250.00032
27 Mar 20250.00044
28 Mar 20250.00032
29 Mar 20250.00265
30 Mar 20250.00032
1 May 20250.00044
5 May 20250.00032
1 Jun 20250.00044
6 Jun 20250.00032
1 Jul 20250.00044
5 Jul 20250.00032
30 Jul 20250.00037
1 Aug 20250.00074
5 Aug 20250.00037
1 Sep 20250.00074
4 Sep 20250.00037
1 Oct 20250.00044
4 Oct 20250.00032
27 Oct 20250.00037
28 Oct 20250.00032
1 Nov 20250.00044
4 Nov 20250.00032
9 Nov 20250.00036
18 Nov 20250.11566
21 Nov 20250.00036
1 Dec 20250.0005
4 Dec 20250.00036
18 Dec 20250.00072
27 Dec 20250.00082
28 Dec 20250.00072
1 Jan 20260.00098
4 Jan 20260.00072
14 Jan 20260.00074
1 Feb 20260.00102
4 Feb 20260.00074
26 Feb 20260.00072
1 Mar 20260.00098
4 Mar 20260.00072
21 Mar 20260.00074
6 Apr 20260.00072
15 Jun 20260.23293
17 Jul 20260.1885
31 Jul 20260.23293

65 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.23293Published2021-01-19Index as of2026-07-31

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-28 and 2025-03-29 (0.00032 → 0.00265) and the record had been public for 5 years, 6 months when this index was last written.

Published 2021-01-19 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-31 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-120, buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow'). The index holds 4490 prior instances of this class, 24 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2020-5135 · SonicWall SonicOSmatches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2018-6789matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2023-33009 · Zyxel ATP series firmwarematches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-33010 · Zyxel ATP series firmwarematches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-37055matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2020-15069matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2020receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

4490 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2021-3177.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.