vciy

CVE-2021-28699

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

inadequate grant-v2 status frames array bounds check The v2 grant table interface separates grant attributes from grant status

CVE-2021-286994 of 4 sources documented this
20

rank 20 = 0 + 14 + 0 + 6 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00353  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 6

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

5 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$10,800over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$10,800 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.00353 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00353EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementsteadyreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-08-28, 1757 days at 0.00, as of 2026-06-20. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running xen? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classNo CWE mapping in held sources.

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in4.12receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00353 · top 71% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth3 products across 3 vendorsderived
Assigned byXENreceipt
Recorded changes20 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productxenreceipt
Published rangesxen >= 4.10.0; fedoraproject fedora 33; fedoraproject fedora 34; fedoraproject fedora 35receipt
Show all 5 published ranges
xen >= 4.10.0
fedoraproject fedora 33
fedoraproject fedora 34
fedoraproject fedora 35
debian linux 11.0
Fixed in4.12receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

inadequate grant-v2 status frames array bounds check The v2 grant table interface separates grant attributes from grant status. That is, when operating in this mode, a guest has two tables. As a result, guests also need to be able to retrieve the addresses that the new status tracking table can be accessed through. For 32-bit guests on x86, translation of requests has to occur because the interface structure layouts commonly differ between 32- and 64-bit. The translation of the request to obtain the frame numbers of the grant status table involves translating the resulting array of frame numbers. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

Since the space used to carry out the translation is limited, the translation layer tells the core function the capacity of the array within translation space. Unfortunately the core function then only enforces array bounds to be below 8 times the specified value, and would write past the available space if enough frame numbers needed storing.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
affected versions
xen >= 4.10.0; fedoraproject fedora 33; fedoraproject fedora 34; and 2 more, listed in full below

check it yourself xenbits.xenproject.org lists.fedoraproject.org lists.fedoraproject.org debian.org lists.fedoraproject.org security.gentoo.org receipt

Movement the material steps

28 Aug 20210.00416
7 Mar 20234.5e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00035 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00342 · scoring model v2026.06.15
20 Jun 20260.00353
Show all 20 observations
28 Aug 20210.00416
2 Sep 20210.0184
6 Sep 20210.0363
22 Sep 20210.04504
25 Sep 20210.05363
10 Oct 20210.01247
6 Jan 20220.05363
4 Feb 20220.01669
1 Apr 20220.0095
15 Aug 20220.01034
7 Mar 20234.5e-4
8 Mar 20230.00045
17 Mar 20250.00035
19 Mar 20250.00047
29 Mar 20250.00074
30 Mar 20250.00047
15 Aug 20250.00101
16 Aug 20250.00074
15 Jun 20260.00342
20 Jun 20260.00353

20 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00353Published2021-08-27Index as of2026-06-20

The record had been public for 4 years, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2021-08-27 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-20 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2021-28699.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.