vciy

CVE-2021-27256

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NETGEAR R7800 firmware version 1.0.2.76

CVE-2021-272564 of 4 sources documented this
32

rank 32 = 0 + 22 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00868  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$43,300over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$43,300 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.00868 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00868EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-04-14, 1888 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2023-43208CVE-2021-27104CVE-2019-15107CVE-2019-16057CVE-2018-10562CVE-2018-1113827256

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Scoring standard
ZdiCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running NETGEAR R7800? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachreachable from an adjacent network · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchr7800 firmware 1.0.2.80; br200 firmware 5.10.0.5; br500 firmware 5.10.0.5; d7800 firmware 1.0.1.60; ex6100v2 firmware 1.0.1.98; ex6150v2 firmware 1.0.1.98receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.8 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00868 · top 43% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth20 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byzdireceipt
Recorded changes15 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productNETGEAR R7800receipt
Published rangesnetgear br200 firmware < 5.10.0.5; netgear br500 firmware < 5.10.0.5; netgear d7800 firmware < 1.0.1.60; netgear ex6100v2 firmware < 1.0.1.98receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
netgear br200 firmware < 5.10.0.5
netgear br500 firmware < 5.10.0.5
netgear d7800 firmware < 1.0.1.60
netgear ex6100v2 firmware < 1.0.1.98
netgear ex6150v2 firmware < 1.0.1.98
netgear ex6250 firmware < 1.0.0.134
netgear ex6400 firmware < 1.0.2.158
netgear ex6400v2 firmware < 1.0.0.134
netgear ex6410 firmware < 1.0.0.134
netgear ex6420 firmware < 1.0.0.134
netgear ex7300 firmware < 1.0.2.158
netgear ex7300v2 firmware < 1.0.0.134
netgear ex7320 firmware < 1.0.0.134
netgear ex7700 firmware < 1.0.0.216
netgear ex8000 firmware < 1.0.1.232
netgear lbr20 firmware < 2.6.3.50
netgear r7800 firmware < 1.0.2.80
netgear r8900 firmware < 1.0.5.28
netgear r9000 firmware < 1.0.5.28
netgear rbk12 firmware < 2.7.2.104

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Adjacent networkno credentials, no interactionNETGEAR R7800CWE-78 OS command injectionFull compromise (C/I/A)C:H / I:H / A:Hexploits CWE-78data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of NETGEAR R7800 firmware version 1.0.2.76. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the rc_service parameter provided to apply_save.cgi. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-12355. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-78
affected versions
netgear br200 firmware < 5.10.0.5; netgear br500 firmware < 5.10.0.5; netgear d7800 firmware < 1.0.1.60; and 17 more, listed in full below

check it yourself kb.netgear.com zerodayinitiative.com receipt

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.01095
7 Mar 20230.00115 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.0041 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00868 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 15 observations
14 Apr 20210.01095
6 Jan 20220.04733
4 Feb 20220.02683
1 Apr 20220.01005
7 Mar 20230.00115
5 Aug 20230.00116
10 Oct 20230.00165
17 Dec 20240.00220
17 Mar 20250.0041
29 Mar 20250.01348
30 Mar 20250.0041
27 Jul 20250.00557
18 Nov 20250.00631
21 Nov 20250.00557
15 Jun 20260.00868

15 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00868Published2021-03-05Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 5 years, 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2021-03-05 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-43208matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-27104matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2019-15107matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2019-16057matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2018-10562matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-11138matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

netgear r7800

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2021-27256.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.