vciy

CVE-2021-20034

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

An improper access control vulnerability in SMA100 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass the path traversal checks and delete an…

CVE-2021-200344 of 4 sources documented this
52

rank 52 = 20 + 23 + 0 + 9 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.81007  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.1, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 52

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

15 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 43

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 52

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$3.56Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$2.30Mon 2025-11-21, the last material move, 9 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$3.56M = $4.99M incident cost x 0.8814887365328109 exposure x 0.81007 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.81007EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.1 CRITICALreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 81 days at 0.81, as of 2026-09-04. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

SonicWall SonicOSCVE-2019-11634CVE-2012-4681PaperCut NGCitrix ShareFileFortinet20034

This record is one instance of CWE-284, improper access control. The index holds 8101 prior instances of this class, 35 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running SonicWall SMA100? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-284 Improper Access Controlreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-284: Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 4 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.1 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.81007 · top 0.39% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bysonicwallreceipt
Recorded changes41 · last 18 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productSonicWall SMA100receipt
Published rangessonicwall sma 200 firmware <= 9.0.0.10-28sv; sonicwall sma 200 firmware >= 10.2.0.0 <= 10.2.0.7-34sv; sonicwall sma 200 firmware >= 10.2.1.0 <= 10.2.1.0-17sv; sonicwall sma 210 firmware <= 9.0.0.10-28svreceipt
Show all 15 published ranges
sonicwall sma 200 firmware <= 9.0.0.10-28sv
sonicwall sma 200 firmware >= 10.2.0.0 <= 10.2.0.7-34sv
sonicwall sma 200 firmware >= 10.2.1.0 <= 10.2.1.0-17sv
sonicwall sma 210 firmware <= 9.0.0.10-28sv
sonicwall sma 210 firmware >= 10.2.0.0 <= 10.2.0.7-34sv
sonicwall sma 210 firmware >= 10.2.1.0 <= 10.2.1.0-17sv
sonicwall sma 400 firmware <= 9.0.0.10-28sv
sonicwall sma 400 firmware >= 10.2.0.0 <= 10.2.0.7-34sv
sonicwall sma 400 firmware >= 10.2.1.0 <= 10.2.1.0-17sv
sonicwall sma 410 firmware <= 9.0.0.10-28sv
sonicwall sma 410 firmware >= 10.2.0.0 <= 10.2.0.7-34sv
sonicwall sma 410 firmware >= 10.2.1.0 <= 10.2.1.0-17sv
sonicwall sma 500v <= 9.0.0.10-28sv
sonicwall sma 500v >= 10.2.0.0 <= 10.2.0.7-34sv
sonicwall sma 500v >= 10.2.1.0 <= 10.2.1.0-17sv

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

An improper access control vulnerability in SMA100 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass the path traversal checks and delete an arbitrary file potentially resulting in a reboot to factory default settings. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-284; CWE-22
affected versions
sonicwall sma 200 firmware <= 9.0.0.10-28sv; sonicwall sma 200 firmware >= 10.2.0.0 <= 10.2.0.7-34sv; sonicwall sma 200 firmware >= 10.2.1.0 <= 10.2.1.0-17sv; and 12 more, listed in full below

check it yourself psirt.global.sonicwall.com packetstormsecurity.com receipt

Dated events

2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.03 to 0.132023-03-07EPSS moved 0.08 to 0.882026-06-15EPSS moved 0.05 to 0.81

Movement the material steps

28 Sep 20210.00523
4 Feb 20220.1294 · crossed 0.10
1 Apr 20220.08382 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.87859 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2023.03.01
20 Apr 20230.77762
23 Jul 20240.64124
30 Oct 20240.51898
28 Nov 20240.47978 · crossed 0.50
17 Dec 20240.19435
30 Jan 20250.29853
17 Mar 20250.05428 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
29 Mar 20250.24837 · crossed 0.10
30 Mar 20250.05436 · crossed 0.10
18 Nov 20250.57062 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50
21 Nov 20250.04701 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50
15 Jun 20260.81137 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15
4 Sep 20260.81007
Show all 41 observations
28 Sep 20210.00523
21 Oct 20210.03427
4 Feb 20220.1294
1 Apr 20220.08382
15 Jul 20220.01055
15 Nov 20220.08382
7 Mar 20230.87859
10 Mar 20230.86477
7 Apr 20230.79704
20 Apr 20230.77762
31 Jul 20230.75811
27 Aug 20230.75076
11 Oct 20230.78714
21 Apr 20240.77077
3 May 20240.71912
12 Jun 20240.70149
23 Jul 20240.64124
30 Oct 20240.51898
28 Nov 20240.47978
17 Dec 20240.19435
29 Dec 20240.26950
13 Jan 20250.28006
30 Jan 20250.29853
14 Feb 20250.31031
17 Mar 20250.05428
19 Mar 20250.05436
23 Mar 20250.08507
24 Mar 20250.05436
29 Mar 20250.24837
30 Mar 20250.05436
4 May 20250.07211
2 Sep 20250.05436
11 Oct 20250.04701
18 Nov 20250.57062
21 Nov 20250.04701
11 Jan 20260.05777
26 May 20260.05436
15 Jun 20260.81137
23 Jun 20260.80701
13 Aug 20260.81137
4 Sep 20260.81007

41 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.81007Published2021-09-27Index as of2026-09-04

The record had been public for 4 years, 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2021-09-27 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-04 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-284, improper access control. The index holds 8101 prior instances of this class, 35 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-40766 · SonicWall SonicOSmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2019-11634matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2012-4681matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2012receipt
CVE-2023-27350 · PaperCut NGmatches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-22941 · Citrix ShareFile storage zones controllermatches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2026-35616 · Fortinet FortiClientEMSmatches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

8101 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

sonicwall sma100

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

Nothing we hold separates this record from the others in its defect family. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2021-20034.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.