vciy

CVE-2020-9054

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

ZyXEL NAS products running firmware version 5.21 and earlier are vulnerable to pre-authentication command injection in weblogin.cgi

CVE-2020-90544 of 4 sources documented this
81

rank 81 = 40 + 25 + 0 + 10 + 6

rank@v1 · act now

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.99988 · CISA KEV listed  ·  without this subject the record ranks 41

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 56

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 81

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 71

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

CISA remediation date held  ·  without this subject the record ranks 75

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$4.99Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$3.88Mon 2022-02-04, the last material move, 4 years, 7 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$4.99M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.99988 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.99988EPSSKEV · LISTED
Severity9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationin the wild · KEVreceipt
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-03-07, 1277 days at 1.00, as of 2026-09-04. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2023-43208CVE-2021-27104CVE-2019-15107CVE-2019-16057CVE-2018-10562CVE-2018-111389054

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running ZyXEL NAS326? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]
Ransomware campaign useUnknown to CISAreceipt

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchatp100 firmware 4.35\(abps.3\)c0; atp200 firmware 4.35\(abfw.3\)c0; atp500 firmware 4.35\(abfu.3\)c0; atp800 firmware 4.35\(abiq.3\)c0; nas326 firmware 5.21\(aazf.7\)c0…receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
CISA remediation statusoverdue since 2022-04-15receipt
CISA required actionApply updates per vendor instructions.receipt
Published to CISA KEV751 daysderived

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed, 2022-03-25.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository2021-09-09receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed2022-03-25receipt
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.99988 · top 0.02% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth20 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bycertccreceipt
Recorded changes63 · last 9 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productZyXEL NAS326; ZyXEL NAS520; ZyXEL NAS540; ZyXEL NAS542; ZyXEL NSA210; ZyXEL NSA220; ZyXEL NSA220+; ZyXEL NSA221; ZyXEL NSA310; ZyXEL NSA320; ZyXEL NSA320S; ZyXEL NSA325; ZyXEL NSA325v2receipt
Published rangeszyxel nas326 firmware < 5.21\(aazf.7\)c0; zyxel nas520 firmware < 5.21\(aasz.3\)c0; zyxel nas540 firmware < 5.21\(aatb.4\)c0; zyxel nas542 firmware < 5.21\(abag.4\)c0receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
zyxel nas326 firmware < 5.21\(aazf.7\)c0
zyxel nas520 firmware < 5.21\(aasz.3\)c0
zyxel nas540 firmware < 5.21\(aatb.4\)c0
zyxel nas542 firmware < 5.21\(abag.4\)c0
zyxel atp100 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(abps.3\)c0
zyxel atp200 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(abfw.3\)c0
zyxel atp500 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(abfu.3\)c0
zyxel atp800 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(abiq.3\)c0
zyxel usg20-vpn firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(abaq.3\)c0
zyxel usg20w-vpn firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(abar.3\)c0
zyxel usg40 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aala.3\)c0
zyxel usg40w firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aalb.3\)c0
zyxel usg60 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aaky.3\)c0
zyxel usg60w firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aakz.3\)c0
zyxel usg110 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aaph.3\)c0
zyxel usg210 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aapi.3\)c0
zyxel usg310 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aapj.3\)c0
zyxel usg1100 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aapk.3\)c0
zyxel usg1900 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(aapl.3\)c0
zyxel usg2200 firmware >= 4.35 < 4.35\(abae.3\)c0

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Multiple ZyXEL network-attached storage (NAS) devices running firmware version 5.21 contain a pre-authentication command injection vulnerability, which may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable device. ZyXEL NAS devices achieve authentication by using the weblogin.cgi CGI executable. This program fails to properly sanitize the username parameter that is passed to it. If the username parameter contains certain characters, it can allow command injection with the privileges of the web server that runs on the ZyXEL device. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

Although the web server does not run as the root user, ZyXEL devices include a setuid utility that can be leveraged to run any command with root privileges. As such, it should be assumed that exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to remote code execution with root privileges. By sending a specially-crafted HTTP POST or GET request to a vulnerable ZyXEL device, a remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code on the device. This may happen by directly connecting to a device if it is directly exposed to an attacker. However, there are ways to trigger such crafted requests even if an attacker does not have direct connectivity to a vulnerable devices. For example, simply visiting a website can result in the compromise of any ZyXEL device that is reachable from the client system. Affected products include: NAS326 before firmware V5.21(AAZF.7)C0 NAS520 before firmware V5.21(AASZ.3)C0 NAS540 before firmware V5.21(AATB.4)C0 NAS542 before firmware V5.21(ABAG.4)C0 ZyXEL has made firmware updates available for NAS326, NAS520, NAS540, and NAS542 devices. Affected models that are end-of-support: NSA210, NSA220, NSA220+, NSA221, NSA310, NSA310S, NSA320, NSA320S, NSA325 and NSA325v2

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-78
affected versions
zyxel nas326 firmware < 5.21\(aazf.7\)c0; zyxel nas520 firmware < 5.21\(aasz.3\)c0; zyxel nas540 firmware < 5.21\(aatb.4\)c0; and 17 more, listed in full below
also scored by
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself cwe.mitre.org zyxel.com kb.cert.org kb.cert.org krebsonsecurity.com receipt

Dated events

2021-09-13EPSS moved 0.03 to 0.122022-02-04EPSS moved 0.12 to 0.892022-03-25Added to CISA KEV2022-04-15CISA remediation due2026-06-15EPSS moved 0.94 to 1.00

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.02891
13 Sep 20210.11783 · crossed 0.10
4 Feb 20220.8946 · crossed 0.50
7 Mar 20230.97505 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.94074 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.99988 · scoring model v2026.06.15
28 Aug 20260.99988
Show all 49 observations
14 Apr 20210.02891
13 Sep 20210.11783
4 Feb 20220.8946
7 Mar 20230.97505
8 Mar 20230.97498
7 Apr 20230.97508
21 Apr 20230.97489
6 May 20230.97402
22 May 20230.97408
21 Jun 20230.97380
12 Jul 20230.97373
25 Aug 20230.97346
22 Sep 20230.97355
30 Sep 20230.97135
17 Oct 20230.97074
20 Nov 20230.97029
5 Dec 20230.96999
7 Jan 20240.96978
7 Feb 20240.96957
8 Feb 20240.96976
27 Feb 20240.96953
31 Mar 20240.96910
1 May 20240.96901
31 May 20240.96920
15 Jun 20240.96772
18 Jul 20240.97001
2 Sep 20240.96978
15 Sep 20240.96987
17 Sep 20240.96978
28 Sep 20240.96987
3 Dec 20240.97052
17 Dec 20240.94893
23 Dec 20240.94975
24 Jan 20250.95129
26 Feb 20250.94859
16 Mar 20250.94601
17 Mar 20250.94074
27 Mar 20250.94124
28 Mar 20250.94074
29 Mar 20250.94244
30 Mar 20250.94074
6 Jun 20250.94265
27 Jul 20250.94312
18 Nov 20250.94218
21 Nov 20250.94312
2 May 20260.94265
15 Jun 20260.99988
24 Jul 20260.99986
28 Aug 20260.99988

49 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.99988Published2020-03-04Public PoC2021-09-09CISA KEV2022-03-25Index as of2026-09-04

Listed by CISA 751 days after it published and the record had been public for 6 years, 6 months when this index was last written.

Published 2020-03-04 receipt · Public PoC 2021-09-09 receipt · CISA KEV 2022-03-25 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-04 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-43208matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-27104matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2019-15107matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2019-16057matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2018-10562matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-11138matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2020-9054.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.