vciy

CVE-2020-8899

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Memory corruption in Quram library when decoding qmg can lead to RCE

CVE-2020-88994 of 4 sources documented this
32

rank 32 = 1 + 25 + 1 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.05758  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 7

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2026-02-08  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$267,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$315,000on 2026-02-08, the last material move, 6 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$267,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.9280467328949208 exposure x 0.05758 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.05758EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity10 CRITICALreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-03-29, 136 days at 0.06, as of 2026-08-12. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft WindowsFortinetFortinetLinux8899

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Google10 CRITICALreceipt
NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Scoring standard
GoogleCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Samsung Android OS? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality and integrity loss; partial availability loss, with impact on subsequent systemsreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflowreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-122: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Execute…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 12 Aug 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA10 CRITICALreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.05758 · top 7% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byGooglereceipt
Recorded changes23 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productSamsung Android OSreceipt
Published rangesgoogle android 8.0; google android 8.1; google android 9.0; google android 10.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

There is a buffer overwrite vulnerability in the Quram qmg library of Samsung's Android OS versions O(8.x), P(9.0) and Q(10.0). An unauthenticated, unauthorized attacker sending a specially crafted MMS to a vulnerable phone can trigger a heap-based buffer overflow in the Quram image codec leading to an arbitrary remote code execution (RCE) without any user interaction. The Samsung ID is SVE-2020-16747. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-122; CWE-787
affected versions
google android 8.0; google android 8.1; google android 9.0; and 1 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 10 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

The CNA scored it 10 and NVD 9.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself security.samsungmobile.com bugs.chromium.org packetstormsecurity.com kb.cert.org receipt

Dated events

2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.04 to 0.542026-06-15EPSS moved 0.15 to 0.06

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.00949
4 Feb 20220.53745 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50
1 Apr 20220.05634 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50
7 Mar 20230.01627 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Dec 20240.22253 · crossed 0.10
17 Mar 20250.10201 · scoring model v2025.03.14
8 Oct 20250.0954 · crossed 0.10
18 Nov 20250.13745 · crossed 0.10
21 Nov 20250.0954 · crossed 0.10
8 Feb 20260.16338 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.05711 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
12 Aug 20260.05758
Show all 23 observations
14 Apr 20210.00949
6 Jan 20220.04123
4 Feb 20220.53745
1 Apr 20220.05634
7 Mar 20230.01627
29 Mar 20230.02290
25 Apr 20230.02942
9 Sep 20230.03527
24 Sep 20230.03390
17 Dec 20240.22253
17 Mar 20250.10201
29 Mar 20250.16983
30 Mar 20250.10201
8 May 20250.13244
29 Jun 20250.17834
8 Sep 20250.13244
8 Oct 20250.0954
18 Nov 20250.13745
21 Nov 20250.0954
8 Feb 20260.16338
29 Mar 20260.15223
15 Jun 20260.05711
12 Aug 20260.05758

23 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.05758Published2020-05-06Index as of2026-08-12

The record had been public for 6 years, 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2020-05-06 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-12 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-30051 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-23376 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-27997 · Fortinet FortiOS-6K7Konly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-28252 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2025-25249 · Fortinet FortiSwitchManageronly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-53362 · Linuxonly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3216 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2020-8899.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.