vciy

CVE-2020-14295

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A SQL injection issue in color.php in Cacti 1.2.12 allows an admin to inject SQL via the filter parameter

CVE-2020-142953 of 4 sources documented this
52

rank 52 = 28 + 18 + 1 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.86330  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.2, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 34

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-08-11  ·  without this subject the record ranks 51

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

3 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 47

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 52

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$4.31Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$1.90Mon 2024-12-17, the last material move, 1 year, 5 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$4.31M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.8633 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.8633EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.2 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-08-11, 308 days at 0.86, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

FortinetProgress SoftwareCVE-2023-34362SonicWall SMA100SonicWallCVE-2021-4225814295

This record is one instance of CWE-89, improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection'). The index holds 20889 prior instances of this class, 31 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-89: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Confidentiality: Read Application Data; Authentication: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories, 2021-04-28.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories2021-04-28receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.2 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.8633 · top 0.27% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 2 vendorsderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes45 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesCacti; Fedoraproject fedorareceipt
Published rangescacti 1.2.12; fedoraproject fedora 31; fedoraproject fedora 32receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A SQL injection issue in color.php in Cacti 1.2.12 allows an admin to inject SQL via the filter parameter. This can lead to remote command execution because the product accepts stacked queries. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-89
affected versions
cacti 1.2.12; fedoraproject fedora 31; fedoraproject fedora 32

check it yourself github.com lists.fedoraproject.org lists.fedoraproject.org lists.opensuse.org security.gentoo.org lists.opensuse.org +2 morereceipt

Dated events

2021-04-29EPSS moved 0.03 to 0.132023-03-07EPSS moved 0.88 to 0.052026-06-15EPSS moved 0.79 to 0.86

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.03168
29 Apr 20210.128 · crossed 0.10
2 Jun 20210.55374 · crossed 0.50
4 Feb 20220.87968
7 Mar 20230.04699 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2023.03.01
8 Nov 20230.26261 · crossed 0.10
29 Oct 20240.37167
14 Dec 20240.27130
17 Dec 20240.65235 · crossed 0.50
31 Jan 20250.80809
17 Mar 20250.78963 · scoring model v2025.03.14
18 Nov 20250.89539
31 May 20260.78686
15 Jun 20260.8633 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 42 observations
14 Apr 20210.03168
29 Apr 20210.128
30 Apr 20210.14378
2 Jun 20210.55374
3 Jun 20210.58283
4 Feb 20220.87968
15 Jul 20220.81483
15 Nov 20220.87968
7 Mar 20230.04699
26 Apr 20230.05553
24 May 20230.07654
21 Jun 20230.07921
21 Jul 20230.09532
4 Oct 20230.09058
8 Nov 20230.26261
21 Nov 20230.23965
26 Dec 20230.32448
4 Mar 20240.32192
19 Mar 20240.30207
24 Jun 20240.35626
12 Aug 20240.35731
11 Oct 20240.32686
29 Oct 20240.37167
28 Nov 20240.31521
14 Dec 20240.27130
17 Dec 20240.65235
29 Dec 20240.70640
31 Jan 20250.80809
12 Feb 20250.84984
4 Mar 20250.82998
17 Mar 20250.78963
29 Mar 20250.79115
30 Mar 20250.78963
4 May 20250.76599
19 Jun 20250.76286
11 Aug 20250.81199
16 Sep 20250.80954
21 Sep 20250.81199
18 Nov 20250.89539
21 Nov 20250.81199
31 May 20260.78686
15 Jun 20260.8633

42 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.8633Published2020-06-17Public PoC2021-04-28Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2024-12-14 and 2024-12-17 (0.2713 → 0.65235) and the record had been public for 5 years, 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2020-06-17 receipt · Public PoC 2021-04-28 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-89, improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection'). The index holds 20889 prior instances of this class, 31 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-48788 · Fortinet FortiClientEMSmatches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-6670 · Progress Software Corporation WhatsUp Goldmatches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-34362matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-20016 · SonicWall SMA100matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-20028 · SonicWall SRA/SMA100matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-42258matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

20889 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2020-14295.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.