vciy

CVE-2019-9193

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

In PostgreSQL 9.3 through 11.2, the "COPY TO/FROM PROGRAM" function allows superusers and users in the 'pg_execute_server_program' group to execute…

CVE-2019-91933 of 4 sources documented this
49

rank 49 = 29 + 18 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.91655  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.2, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 49

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 47

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 49

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$4.57Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$105,000on 2026-09-06, the last material move
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$4.57M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.91655 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.91655EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.2 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-02-04, 1675 days at 0.92, as of 2026-09-06. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

PHPCVE-2023-43208CVE-2021-27104QNAP Systems Inc.CVE-2019-15107CVE-2019-160579193

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 6 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 8 public repositories, 2020-02-12.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 8 public repositories2020-02-12receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.2 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.91655 · top 0.19% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes103 · last 17 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesPostgresqlreceipt
Published rangespostgresql >= 9.3 <= 11.2receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

In PostgreSQL 9.3 through 11.2, the "COPY TO/FROM PROGRAM" function allows superusers and users in the 'pg_execute_server_program' group to execute arbitrary code in the context of the database's operating system user. This functionality is enabled by default and can be abused to run arbitrary operating system commands on Windows, Linux, and macOS. NOTE: Third parties claim/state this is not an issue because PostgreSQL functionality for ‘COPY TO/FROM PROGRAM’ is acting as intended. References state that in PostgreSQL, a superuser can execute commands as the server user without using the ‘COPY FROM PROGRAM’. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.2 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-78
affected versions
postgresql >= 9.3 <= 11.2

check it yourself paquier.xyz medium.com blog.hagander.net trustwave.com security.netapp.com packetstormsecurity.com +2 morereceipt

Dated events

2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.46 to 0.882026-09-06EPSS moved 0.90 to 0.92

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.4629
4 Feb 20220.8778 · crossed 0.50
7 Mar 20230.97393 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.93941 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.91877 · scoring model v2026.06.15
23 Aug 20260.89541 · crossed 0.90
30 Aug 20260.91655 · crossed 0.90
5 Sep 20260.89541 · crossed 0.90
6 Sep 20260.91655 · crossed 0.90
Show all 100 observations
14 Apr 20210.4629
4 Feb 20220.8778
31 Mar 20220.88202
7 Mar 20230.97393
8 Mar 20230.97322
7 Apr 20230.97266
8 Apr 20230.97299
25 Apr 20230.97285
27 May 20230.97293
27 Jun 20230.97340
13 Aug 20230.97319
12 Sep 20230.97258
28 Sep 20230.97119
26 Oct 20230.97198
15 Nov 20230.97189
27 Nov 20230.97298
20 Jan 20240.97361
21 Feb 20240.97164
10 Mar 20240.97196
25 Mar 20240.97181
6 Apr 20240.97475
12 Apr 20240.97486
29 Apr 20240.97490
5 Jun 20240.97434
23 Jun 20240.97463
31 Jul 20240.97479
22 Aug 20240.97487
12 Sep 20240.97441
1 Oct 20240.97428
17 Dec 20240.97411
14 Jan 20250.97417
8 Feb 20250.97378
11 Mar 20250.97369
17 Mar 20250.93941
20 Mar 20250.93864
23 Mar 20250.93941
25 Mar 20250.93966
26 Mar 20250.94007
27 Mar 20250.93966
28 Mar 20250.93941
29 Mar 20250.93966
30 Mar 20250.93941
1 May 20250.93826
4 May 20250.93941
6 May 20250.93897
12 May 20250.93886
14 May 20250.93883
15 May 20250.93685
27 May 20250.93742
1 Jun 20250.93651
4 Jun 20250.93742
22 Jun 20250.93685
1 Jul 20250.93587
4 Jul 20250.93685
6 Jul 20250.93652
1 Aug 20250.93551
4 Aug 20250.93652
17 Aug 20250.93587
1 Sep 20250.93479
4 Sep 20250.93587
24 Sep 20250.93716
1 Oct 20250.93801
4 Oct 20250.93716
9 Oct 20250.93657
31 Oct 20250.93716
1 Nov 20250.93801
4 Nov 20250.93716
15 Nov 20250.93635
18 Nov 20250.91769
21 Nov 20250.93635
1 Dec 20250.93728
4 Dec 20250.93705
5 Dec 20250.93571
17 Dec 20250.93587
22 Dec 20250.93571
1 Jan 20260.9367
4 Jan 20260.93571
6 Jan 20260.93587
15 Jan 20260.93574
18 Jan 20260.93558
23 Jan 20260.93633
25 Jan 20260.93558
27 Jan 20260.93633
1 Feb 20260.93658
4 Feb 20260.93633
11 Feb 20260.93382
18 Feb 20260.9347
1 Mar 20260.93499
4 Mar 20260.93382
17 Mar 20260.93401
10 Apr 20260.93484
20 Apr 20260.93401
29 Apr 20260.93484
31 May 20260.93645
15 Jun 20260.91877
23 Jul 20260.91655
23 Aug 20260.89541
30 Aug 20260.91655
5 Sep 20260.89541
6 Sep 20260.91655

100 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.91655Published2019-04-01Public PoC2020-02-12Index as of2026-09-06

The record had been public for 7 years, 5 months when this index was last written.

Published 2019-04-01 receipt · Public PoC 2020-02-12 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-06 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-4577 · PHPmatches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-43208matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-27104matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2018-19949 · QNAP Systems Inc. QTSmatches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2019-15107matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2019-16057matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2019-9193.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.