vciy

CVE-2019-3810

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A flaw was found in moodle versions 3.6 to 3.6.1, 3.5 to 3.5.3, 3.4 to 3.4.6, 3.1 to 3.1.15 and earlier unsupported versions

CVE-2019-38104 of 4 sources documented this
38

rank 38 = 17 + 15 + 1 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.13901  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.1, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 23

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2026-03-13  ·  without this subject the record ranks 37

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 38

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$167,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$25,700on 2025-11-21, the last material move, 6 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$167,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.13901 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.13901EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity4.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-03-13, 94 days at 0.14, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2021-26829ZimbraRoundcube WebmailCVE-2018-6882CVE-2024-27443CVE-2024-373833810

This record is one instance of CWE-79, improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting'). The index holds 47894 prior instances of this class, 32 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Redhat4.3 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD6.1 MEDIUMreceipt
Scoring standard
RedhatCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt
What it costs
RedhatPartial integrity lossreceipt
NVDPartial confidentiality and integrity loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running [UNKNOWN] moodle? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-79: Access Control, Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data; Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository, 2021-04-29.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 1 public repository2021-04-29receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA4.3 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD6.1 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.13901 · top 4% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byredhatreceipt
Recorded changes50 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected product[UNKNOWN] moodlereceipt
Published rangesmoodle >= 3.1.0 <= 3.1.15; moodle >= 3.4.0 <= 3.4.6; moodle >= 3.5.0 <= 3.5.3; moodle >= 3.6.0 <= 3.6.1receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A flaw was found in moodle versions 3.6 to 3.6.1, 3.5 to 3.5.3, 3.4 to 3.4.6, 3.1 to 3.1.15 and earlier unsupported versions. The /userpix/ page did not escape users' full names, which are included as text when hovering over profile images. Note this page is not linked to by default and its access is restricted. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
weakness
CWE-79
affected versions
moodle >= 3.1.0 <= 3.1.15; moodle >= 3.4.0 <= 3.4.6; moodle >= 3.5.0 <= 3.5.3; and 1 more, listed in full below

The CNA scored it 4.3 and NVD 6.1. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself bugzilla.redhat.com moodle.org git.moodle.org packetstormsecurity.com receipt

Dated events

2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.05 to 0.172023-03-07EPSS moved 0.17 to 0.022026-06-15EPSS moved 0.08 to 0.14

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.00833
4 Feb 20220.17479 · crossed 0.10
15 Jul 20220.07176 · crossed 0.10
15 Nov 20220.17479 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.01563 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.06714 · scoring model v2025.03.14
19 Mar 20250.10471 · crossed 0.10
20 Mar 20250.06714 · crossed 0.10
23 Mar 20250.10471 · crossed 0.10
24 Mar 20250.06714 · crossed 0.10
27 Mar 20250.10471 · crossed 0.10
28 Mar 20250.06714 · crossed 0.10
29 Mar 20250.14762 · crossed 0.10
30 Mar 20250.06714 · crossed 0.10
9 Aug 20250.11244 · crossed 0.10
20 Sep 20250.09512 · crossed 0.10
18 Nov 20250.10604 · crossed 0.10
21 Nov 20250.08464 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.13901 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 47 observations
14 Apr 20210.00833
30 Apr 20210.0363
1 May 20210.04504
4 Feb 20220.17479
15 Jul 20220.07176
8 Nov 20220.04134
15 Nov 20220.17479
7 Mar 20230.01563
20 Jun 20230.01873
19 Jul 20230.01808
21 Sep 20230.01606
19 Oct 20230.01875
13 Jan 20240.01783
14 Feb 20240.02063
3 Mar 20240.01795
18 Mar 20240.01802
5 Apr 20240.01790
29 May 20240.01801
16 Jun 20240.01842
15 Aug 20240.01504
17 Dec 20240.02289
17 Mar 20250.06714
19 Mar 20250.10471
20 Mar 20250.06714
23 Mar 20250.10471
24 Mar 20250.06714
27 Mar 20250.10471
28 Mar 20250.06714
29 Mar 20250.14762
30 Mar 20250.06714
15 May 20250.07714
29 Jun 20250.08846
1 Jul 20250.04584
11 Jul 20250.08846
30 Jul 20250.09689
9 Aug 20250.11244
5 Sep 20250.10373
20 Sep 20250.09512
11 Oct 20250.08464
18 Nov 20250.10604
21 Nov 20250.08464
23 Nov 20250.0786
8 Jan 20260.07723
29 Jan 20260.03972
23 Feb 20260.03828
13 Mar 20260.08385
15 Jun 20260.13901

47 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.13901Published2019-03-25Public PoC2021-04-29Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-03-28 and 2025-03-29 (0.06714 → 0.14762) and the record had been public for 7 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2019-03-25 receipt · Public PoC 2021-04-29 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-79, improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting'). The index holds 47894 prior instances of this class, 32 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2021-26829matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2025-66376 · Zimbra Collaborationmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-68461 · Roundcube Webmailmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2018-6882matches 4 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2024-27443matches 4 of 8KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-37383matches 4 of 8KEV listed · 2024receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

47894 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

[unknown] moodle

Of the 5 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest EPSS percentile: 0.96271.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2019-3810.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.