vciy

CVE-2019-1717

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Cisco Video Surveillance Manager Web-Based Management Interface Information Disclosure Vulnerability

CVE-2019-17174 of 4 sources documented this
24

rank 24 = 3 + 19 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.10053  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$307,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$299,000on 2022-04-01, the last material move, 4 years, 2 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$307,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.10053 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.10053EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.5 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-04-14, 1888 days at 0.10, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2024-57727ConfiguratorZyxel ATP seriesCVE-2024-41713CVE-2023-41266SonicWall Email1717

This record is one instance of CWE-22, improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal'). The index holds 10301 prior instances of this class, 94 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Cisco Video Surveillance Manager? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-22: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Integrity: Modify Files or Directories; Confidentiality: Read Files or Directories…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in7.12.1receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.5 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.10053 · top 5% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byciscoreceipt
Recorded changes20 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productCisco Video Surveillance Managerreceipt
Published rangescisco video surveillance manager 7.21receipt
Fixed in7.12.1receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interactionCisco Video Surveillance ManagerCWE-22 path traversalConfidentiality lossC:Hexploits CWE-22data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Video Surveillance Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of parameters handled by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious requests to an affected component. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to download arbitrary files from the affected device, which could contain sensitive information. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-22
affected versions
cisco video surveillance manager 7.21
also scored by
[email protected] 7.5 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

check it yourself tools.cisco.com securityfocus.com receipt

Dated events

2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.04 to 0.112022-04-01EPSS moved 0.11 to 0.012026-06-15EPSS moved 0.02 to 0.10

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.00833
4 Feb 20220.10855 · crossed 0.10
1 Apr 20220.01055 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.00304 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.01899 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.10053 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 20 observations
14 Apr 20210.00833
6 Jan 20220.03634
4 Feb 20220.10855
1 Apr 20220.01055
7 Mar 20230.00304
24 Jun 20230.00431
8 Sep 20230.00532
11 Nov 20230.00489
26 Nov 20230.00586
29 Dec 20230.00450
5 Apr 20240.00513
5 Oct 20240.00310
17 Dec 20240.00274
17 Mar 20250.01899
19 Mar 20250.02928
29 Mar 20250.04305
30 Mar 20250.02928
24 Dec 20250.02842
28 Feb 20260.02123
15 Jun 20260.10053

20 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.10053Published2019-05-15Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 7 years, 1 month when this index was last written.

Published 2019-05-15 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-22, improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal'). The index holds 10301 prior instances of this class, 94 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-57727matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-61884 · Oracle Configuratormatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-11667 · Zyxel ATP series firmwarematches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-41713matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-41266matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-20023 · SonicWall Email Securitymatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

10301 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2019-1717.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.