vciy

CVE-2019-1599

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Cisco NX-OS Software Netstack Denial of Service Vulnerability

CVE-2019-15994 of 4 sources documented this
35

rank 35 = 4 + 22 + 0 + 9 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.14283  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.6, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

16 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$436,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$436,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.14283 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.14283EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.6 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-11-21, 247 days at 0.14, as of 2026-07-26. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Cisco IOSCisco IOS and IOSCisco IOS1599

This record is one instance of CWE-399. The index holds 2695 prior instances of this class, 11 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Scoring standard
CiscoCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Cisco Nexus 1000V Switch for Microsoft…? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-399receipt
Published consequencesMITRE publishes no common consequences for this weakness.[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in5.2(1)SM3(2.1); 5.2(1)SV3(4.1a); 7.0(3)I7(6); 9.2(2); 6.0(2)A8(11); 7.0(3)F3(5); 7.1(5)N1(1b); 7.3(5)N1(1); 6.2(22); 7.3(3)D1(1); 8.2(3); 8.3(2); 3.2(3j)…receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.6 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.6 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.14283 · top 4% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byciscoreceipt
Recorded changes17 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productCisco Nexus 1000V Switch for Microsoft Hyper-V; Cisco Nexus 1000V Switch for VMware vSphere; Cisco Nexus 3000 Series Switches; Cisco Nexus 3500 Platform Switches; Cisco Nexus 3600 Platform Switches…receipt
Published rangescisco nx-os >= 9.2 < 9.2\(2\); cisco nx-os >= 7.0\(3\) < 7.0\(3\)i7\(5\); cisco nx-os >= 7.0\(3\) < 7.0\(3\)f3\(5\); cisco nx-os >= 7.2 < 7.3\(5\)n1\(1\)receipt
Show all 16 published ranges
cisco nx-os >= 9.2 < 9.2\(2\)
cisco nx-os >= 7.0\(3\) < 7.0\(3\)i7\(5\)
cisco nx-os >= 7.0\(3\) < 7.0\(3\)f3\(5\)
cisco nx-os >= 7.2 < 7.3\(5\)n1\(1\)
cisco nx-os >= 8.3 < 8.3\(2\)
cisco nx-os < 6.0\(2\)a8\(11\)
cisco nx-os < 6.2\(22\)
cisco nx-os >= 7.0\(3\)i5 < 7.0\(3\)i7\(6\)
cisco nx-os < 5.2\(1\)sm3\(2.1\)
cisco nx-os < 5.2\(1\)sv3\(4.1a\)
cisco nx-os >= 4.0 < 4.0\(2a\)
cisco nx-os < 3.2\(3j\)
cisco nx-os < 7.0\(3\)i4\(9\)
cisco nx-os < 7.1\(5\)n1\(1b\)
cisco nx-os >= 8.0 < 8.2\(3\)
cisco nx-os >= 7.2 < 7.3\(3\)d1\(1\)
Fixed in5.2(1)SM3(2.1); 5.2(1)SV3(4.1a); 7.0(3)I7(6); 9.2(2); 6.0(2)A8(11); 7.0(3)F3(5); 7.1(5)N1(1b); 7.3(5)N1(1); 6.2(22); 7.3(3)D1(1); 8.2(3); 8.3(2); 3.2(3j)…receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Unauthenticated network requestno credentials, no interaction5600CWE-399 weaknessAdjacent componentsscope changeAvailability lossA:Hexploits CWE-399scope changedata compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the network stack of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the affected device. The vulnerability is due to an issue with allocating and freeing memory buffers in the network stack. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted TCP streams to an affected device in a sustained way. A successful exploit could cause the network stack of an affected device to run out of available buffers, impairing operations of control plane and management plane protocols, resulting in a DoS condition. receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

Note: This vulnerability can be triggered only by traffic that is destined to an affected device and cannot be exploited using traffic that transits an affected device. Nexus 1000V Switch for Microsoft Hyper-V is affected in versions prior to 5.2(1)SM3(2.1). Nexus 1000V Switch for VMware vSphere is affected in versions prior to 5.2(1)SV3(4.1a). Nexus 3000 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)I7(6) and 9.2(2). Nexus 3500 Platform Switches are affected in versions prior to 6.0(2)A8(11), 7.0(3)I7(6), and 9.2(2). Nexus 3600 Platform Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)F3(5) and 9.2(2). Nexus 5500, 5600, and 6000 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.1(5)N1(1b) and 7.3(5)N1(1). Nexus 7000 and 7700 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 6.2(22. Nexus 9500 R-Series Line Cards and Fabric Modules are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)F3(5) and 9.2(2). UCS 6200 and 6300 Series Fabric Interconnect are affected in versions prior to 3.2(3j) and 4.0(2a). UCS 6400 Series Fabric Interconnect are affected in versions prior to 4.0(2a).

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.6 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-399; CWE-770
affected versions
cisco nx-os >= 9.2 < 9.2\(2\); cisco nx-os >= 7.0\(3\) < 7.0\(3\)i7\(5\); cisco nx-os >= 7.0\(3\) < 7.0\(3\)f3\(5\); and 13 more, listed in full below

check it yourself tools.cisco.com securityfocus.com receipt

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.00976
7 Mar 20230.00157 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.03672 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.14166 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
26 Jul 20260.14283

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 17 observations
14 Apr 20210.00976
6 Jan 20220.04237
4 Feb 20220.04499
1 Apr 20220.01055
7 Mar 20230.00157
27 Jul 20240.00128
17 Dec 20240.00094
14 Jan 20250.00096
17 Mar 20250.03672
19 Mar 20250.06848
29 Mar 20250.09046
30 Mar 20250.06848
16 Oct 20250.05861
18 Nov 20250.02603
21 Nov 20250.05861
15 Jun 20260.14166
26 Jul 20260.14283

17 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.14283Published2019-03-07Index as of2026-07-26

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-11-18 and 2025-11-21 (0.02603 → 0.05861) and the record had been public for 7 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2019-03-07 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-26 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-399. The index holds 2695 prior instances of this class, 11 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2018-0154 · Cisco IOSmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-0156 · Cisco IOS and IOS XEmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2017-12231 · Cisco IOSmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2017-12237 · Cisco IOS and IOS XEmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2017-6627 · Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XEmatches 8 of 10KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2018-0161 · Cisco IOSmatches 7 of 10KEV listed · 2018receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

2695 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2019-1599.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.