vciy

CVE-2019-15791

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Reference count underflow in shiftfs

CVE-2019-157914 of 4 sources documented this
25

rank 25 = 0 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01317  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$57,900over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$57,900 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.8814887365328109 exposure x 0.01317 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01317EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.1 HIGHreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-04-14, 1888 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Canonical7.1 HIGHreceipt
NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
What it costs
CanonicalComplete integrity and availability lossreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Ubuntu Shiftfs in the Linux kernel? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-672 Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Releasereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-672: Integrity, Confidentiality: Modify Application Data, Read Application Data; Other, Availability: Other, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in5.3.0-22.24; 5.0.0-35.38receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA7.1 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.01317 · top 30% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 2 vendorsderived
Assigned bycanonicalreceipt
Recorded changes18 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productUbuntu Shiftfs in the Linux kernelreceipt
Published rangeslinux kernel 5.0; linux kernel 5.3; canonical ubuntu linux 18.04; canonical ubuntu linux 19.04receipt
Fixed in5.3.0-22.24; 5.0.0-35.38receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Local accessrequires low privilegesUbuntu Shiftfs in the Linux kernelCWE-672 weaknessIntegrity and availability lossI:H / A:Hexploits CWE-672data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

In shiftfs, a non-upstream patch to the Linux kernel included in the Ubuntu 5.0 and 5.3 kernel series, shiftfs_btrfs_ioctl_fd_replace() installs an fd referencing a file from the lower filesystem without taking an additional reference to that file. After the btrfs ioctl completes this fd is closed, which then puts a reference to that file, leading to a refcount underflow. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-672; CWE-191
affected versions
linux kernel 5.0; linux kernel 5.3; canonical ubuntu linux 18.04; and 1 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 7.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

The CNA scored it 7.1 and NVD 7.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself usn.ubuntu.com usn.ubuntu.com git.launchpad.net receipt

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.0363
7 Mar 20234.4e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00161 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.01317 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 18 observations
14 Apr 20210.0363
4 Feb 20220.01412
1 Apr 20220.0089
7 Mar 20234.4e-4
8 Mar 20230.00044
17 Mar 20250.00161
29 Mar 20250.00297
30 Mar 20250.00161
30 Jul 20250.00241
1 Oct 20250.00147
6 Oct 20250.0013
27 Oct 20250.00212
28 Oct 20250.0013
18 Nov 20250.00116
21 Nov 20250.0013
27 Dec 20250.00212
28 Dec 20250.0013
15 Jun 20260.01317

18 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01317Published2020-04-23Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 6 years, 1 month when this index was last written.

Published 2020-04-23 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2019-15791.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.