vciy

CVE-2019-12529

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

An issue was discovered in Squid 2.x through 2.7.STABLE9, 3.x through 3.5.28, and 4.x through 4.7

CVE-2019-125293 of 4 sources documented this
27

rank 27 = 2 + 15 + 1 + 9 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.08092  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.9, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 12

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-10-01  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

14 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$247,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$204,000on 2025-12-28, the last material move, 5 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$247,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.08092 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.08092EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-07-30, 320 days at 0.08, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2014-0160Apple macOSApple SafariESXiMicrosoft Windows12529

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-125 Out-of-bounds Readreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-125: Confidentiality: Read Memory; Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Varies by Context[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchsquid 2.7receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD5.9 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.08092 · top 5% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth5 products across 5 vendorsderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes63 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesSquid-cache squid; Canonical ubuntu linux; Debian linux; and 2 morereceipt
Published rangessquid-cache squid >= 2.0 < 2.7; squid-cache squid >= 3.0 <= 3.5.28; squid-cache squid >= 4.0 <= 4.7; squid-cache squid 2.7receipt
Show all 14 published ranges
squid-cache squid >= 2.0 < 2.7
squid-cache squid >= 3.0 <= 3.5.28
squid-cache squid >= 4.0 <= 4.7
squid-cache squid 2.7
debian linux 8.0
debian linux 9.0
debian linux 10.0
fedoraproject fedora 29
opensuse leap 15.0
opensuse leap 15.1
canonical ubuntu linux 12.04
canonical ubuntu linux 16.04
canonical ubuntu linux 18.04
canonical ubuntu linux 19.04

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

An issue was discovered in Squid 2.x through 2.7.STABLE9, 3.x through 3.5.28, and 4.x through 4.7. When Squid is configured to use Basic Authentication, the Proxy-Authorization header is parsed via uudecode. uudecode determines how many bytes will be decoded by iterating over the input and checking its table. The length is then used to start decoding the string. There are no checks to ensure that the length it calculates isn't greater than the input buffer. This leads to adjacent memory being decoded as well. An attacker would not be able to retrieve the decoded data unless the Squid maintainer had configured the display of usernames on error pages. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.9 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-125
affected versions
squid-cache squid >= 2.0 < 2.7; squid-cache squid >= 3.0 <= 3.5.28; squid-cache squid >= 4.0 <= 4.7; and 11 more, listed in full below

check it yourself squid-cache.org github.com squid-cache.org usn.ubuntu.com lists.debian.org usn.ubuntu.com +6 morereceipt

Dated events

2022-01-06EPSS moved 0.03 to 0.112022-04-01EPSS moved 0.17 to 0.022026-06-15EPSS moved 0.17 to 0.08

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.02678
6 Jan 20220.1099 · crossed 0.10
1 Apr 20220.01537 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.00783 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.13777 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
29 Mar 20250.26762
30 Mar 20250.15889
20 Aug 20250.0954 · crossed 0.10
1 Oct 20250.16605 · crossed 0.10
27 Oct 20250.0954 · crossed 0.10
28 Oct 20250.16208 · crossed 0.10
27 Dec 20250.0954 · crossed 0.10
28 Dec 20250.16208 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.08092 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 63 observations
14 Apr 20210.02678
6 Jan 20220.1099
4 Feb 20220.17166
1 Apr 20220.01537
7 Mar 20230.00783
1 Jun 20230.00745
4 Nov 20230.00735
4 Jul 20240.01058
2 Dec 20240.01086
17 Dec 20240.00538
10 Jan 20250.00882
3 Feb 20250.01102
17 Mar 20250.13777
19 Mar 20250.15889
22 Mar 20250.19764
23 Mar 20250.15889
28 Mar 20250.19764
29 Mar 20250.26762
30 Mar 20250.15889
3 Apr 20250.19764
4 Apr 20250.15889
7 Apr 20250.19764
8 Apr 20250.15889
10 Apr 20250.19764
11 Apr 20250.15889
17 Apr 20250.19764
18 Apr 20250.15889
23 Apr 20250.19764
24 Apr 20250.15889
1 May 20250.19764
5 May 20250.15889
1 Jun 20250.19764
4 Jun 20250.15889
19 Jun 20250.18267
1 Jul 20250.22805
5 Jul 20250.18267
30 Jul 20250.10889
1 Aug 20250.12775
4 Aug 20250.10889
20 Aug 20250.0954
1 Sep 20250.08904
6 Sep 20250.0954
1 Oct 20250.16605
4 Oct 20250.16208
27 Oct 20250.0954
28 Oct 20250.16208
1 Nov 20250.16605
4 Nov 20250.16208
18 Nov 20250.1603
21 Nov 20250.16208
1 Dec 20250.16605
4 Dec 20250.16208
27 Dec 20250.0954
28 Dec 20250.16208
1 Jan 20260.16605
4 Jan 20260.16208
1 Feb 20260.16605
4 Feb 20260.16208
1 Mar 20260.16605
4 Mar 20260.16208
26 Apr 20260.15958
30 May 20260.17466
15 Jun 20260.08092

63 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.08092Published2019-07-11Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 6 years, 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2019-07-11 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-125, out-of-bounds read. The index holds 9767 prior instances of this class, 19 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2014-0160matches 7 of 8KEV listed · 2014receipt
CVE-2023-28204 · Apple macOSmatches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-42916 · Apple Safarimatches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2025-22226 · ESXimatches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-24991 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2022-22674 · Apple macOSmatches 5 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

9767 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2019-12529.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.