vciy

CVE-2018-5463

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A structured exception handler overflow vulnerability in Leao Consultoria e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas (LCDS) LTDA ME LAquis SCADA 4.1.0.3391 and…

CVE-2018-54634 of 4 sources documented this
22

rank 22 = 0 + 20 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00421  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$21,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$21,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.00421 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00421EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementfallenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-04-14, 1983 days at 0.00, as of 2026-09-18. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

This record is one instance of CWE-703, improper check or handling of exceptional conditions. The index holds 176 prior instances of this class, 3 KEV-listed. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Running ICS-CERT LCDS - Le&#195? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-703 Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditionsreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-703: Confidentiality, Availability, Integrity: Read Application Data, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Unexpected State[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 18 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.00421 · top 64% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byicscertreceipt
Recorded changes17 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productICS-CERT LCDS - Leà £ o Consultoria e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas LTDA ME LAquis SCADAreceipt
Published rangeslcds laquis scada <= 4.1.0.3391receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A structured exception handler overflow vulnerability in Leao Consultoria e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas (LCDS) LTDA ME LAquis SCADA 4.1.0.3391 and earlier may allow code execution. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.8 CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-703; CWE-119
affected versions
lcds laquis scada <= 4.1.0.3391

check it yourself ics-cert.us-cert.gov securityfocus.com receipt

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.01095
7 Mar 20234.4e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00102 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00435 · scoring model v2026.06.15
18 Sep 20260.00421
Show all 17 observations
14 Apr 20210.01095
4 Feb 20220.01005
4 Jan 20230.01102
7 Mar 20234.4e-4
8 Mar 20230.00044
17 Dec 20240.00062
17 Mar 20250.00102
29 Mar 20250.00146
30 Mar 20250.00102
5 May 20260.00109
15 Jun 20260.00435
16 Aug 20260.00429
23 Aug 20260.00434
30 Aug 20260.00429
5 Sep 20260.00434
6 Sep 20260.00429
18 Sep 20260.00421

17 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00421Published2018-04-09Index as of2026-09-18

The record had been public for 8 years, 5 months when this index was last written.

Published 2018-04-09 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-18 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-703, improper check or handling of exceptional conditions. The index holds 176 prior instances of this class, 3 KEV-listed. [email protected]

CVE-2021-25370 · Samsung Mobile Devicesmatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-25372 · Samsung Mobile Devicesmatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2022-22265 · Samsung Mobile Devicesmatches 2 of 10KEV listed · 2022receipt

176 records in this class held. The six above are ranked by exploit maturity, then recency.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2018-5463.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.