vciy

CVE-2018-5093

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A heap buffer overflow vulnerability may occur in WebAssembly during Memory/Table resizing, resulting in a potentially exploitable crash

CVE-2018-50934 of 4 sources documented this
32

rank 32 = 5 + 19 + 3 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.19785  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-10-30  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 27

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$604,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$367,000on 2026-09-06, the last material move
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$604,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.19785 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.19785EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity7.5 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defensefix version namedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.01324 to 0.19785 across 34 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Cloud SoftwareCVE-2020-29557BIG-IPCitrix NetScalerMicrosoft WindowsGoogle Chrome5093

This record is one instance of CWE-119, improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer. The index holds 14297 prior instances of this class, 57 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Mozilla Firefox? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Bufferreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-119: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Modify Memory; Availability, Confidentiality: Read Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed in58receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.19785 · top 3% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 2 vendorsderived
Assigned bymozillareceipt
Recorded changes34 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productMozilla Firefoxreceipt
Published rangesmozilla firefox <= 57.0.4; canonical ubuntu linux 14.04; canonical ubuntu linux 16.04; canonical ubuntu linux 17.10receipt
Fixed in58receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A heap buffer overflow vulnerability may occur in WebAssembly during Memory/Table resizing, resulting in a potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 58. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-119
affected versions
mozilla firefox <= 57.0.4; canonical ubuntu linux 14.04; canonical ubuntu linux 16.04; and 1 more, listed in full below

check it yourself bugzilla.mozilla.org securitytracker.com usn.ubuntu.com securityfocus.com mozilla.org receipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.01 to 0.432026-09-06EPSS moved 0.08 to 0.20

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.01324
7 Mar 20230.42738 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Apr 20230.28166
10 Jul 20230.12576
20 Sep 20230.09290 · crossed 0.10
17 Mar 20250.27407 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
29 Mar 20250.53122 · crossed 0.50
30 Mar 20250.27052 · crossed 0.50
12 Aug 20250.14102
30 Oct 20250.3543
17 Apr 20260.21878
15 Jun 20260.20024 · scoring model v2026.06.15
23 Aug 20260.07764 · crossed 0.10
30 Aug 20260.19785 · crossed 0.10
5 Sep 20260.07764 · crossed 0.10
6 Sep 20260.19785 · crossed 0.10

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 34 observations
14 Apr 20210.01324
4 Feb 20220.01018
7 Mar 20230.42738
1 Apr 20230.35170
17 Apr 20230.28166
8 May 20230.35074
5 Jun 20230.27716
8 Jul 20230.21687
10 Jul 20230.12576
20 Sep 20230.09290
2 Nov 20230.06729
12 Dec 20230.05039
29 Jan 20240.03620
17 Dec 20240.00916
17 Mar 20250.27407
27 Mar 20250.27052
29 Mar 20250.53122
30 Mar 20250.27052
6 Jul 20250.23313
12 Aug 20250.14102
20 Aug 20250.15131
2 Sep 20250.14102
24 Sep 20250.18639
29 Oct 20250.18331
30 Oct 20250.3543
27 Dec 20250.32332
28 Dec 20250.3543
17 Apr 20260.21878
15 Jun 20260.20024
16 Aug 20260.19785
23 Aug 20260.07764
30 Aug 20260.19785
5 Sep 20260.07764
6 Sep 20260.19785

34 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.19785Published2018-06-11Index as of2026-09-06

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2026-09-05 and 2026-09-06 (0.07764 → 0.19785) and the record had been public for 8 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

Published 2018-06-11 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-06 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-119, improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer. The index holds 14297 prior instances of this class, 57 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2023-6549 · Cloud Software Group NetScaler ADCmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2020-29557matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2021-22991 · BIG-IPmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2023-4966 · Citrix NetScaler ADCmatches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2020-0796 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit…matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2026-3910 · Google Chromematches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

14297 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2018-5093.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.