vciy

CVE-2018-3980

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

An exploitable out-of-bounds write exists in the TIFF-parsing functionality of Canvas Draw version 5.0.0

CVE-2018-39804 of 4 sources documented this
22

rank 22 = 0 + 20 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01456  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$72,700over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$72,700 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.01456 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01456EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-04-14, 1888 days at 0.01, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Google ChromeFortinetFortinetSonicWall SMA100Microsoft3980

This record is one instance of CWE-787, out-of-bounds write. The index holds 14893 prior instances of this class, 164 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Talos8.8 HIGHreceipt
NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Scoring standard
TalosCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Talos ACD Systems? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · user interaction required · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-787 Out-of-bounds Writereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-787: Integrity: Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; Other: Unexpected State[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.8 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.01456 · top 28% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bytalosreceipt
Recorded changes11 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productTalos ACD Systemsreceipt
Published rangescanvasgfx canvas draw 5.0.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

An exploitable out-of-bounds write exists in the TIFF-parsing functionality of Canvas Draw version 5.0.0. A specially crafted TIFF image processed via the application can lead to an out-of-bounds write, overwriting arbitrary data. An attacker can deliver a TIFF image to trigger this vulnerability and gain code execution. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-787
affected versions
canvasgfx canvas draw 5.0.0

The CNA scored it 8.8 and NVD 7.8. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself talosintelligence.com receipt

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.00731
7 Mar 20239.9e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00391 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.01456 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 11 observations
14 Apr 20210.00731
4 Feb 20220.01036
7 Mar 20239.9e-4
8 Mar 20230.00099
17 Dec 20240.00134
17 Mar 20250.00391
19 Mar 20250.00416
29 Mar 20250.00716
30 Mar 20250.00416
21 Apr 20250.00611
15 Jun 20260.01456

11 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01456Published2019-02-06Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 7 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2019-02-06 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-787, out-of-bounds write. The index holds 14893 prior instances of this class, 164 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2022-2294 · Google Chromematches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2024-21762 · Fortinet FortiProxymatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2022-42475 · Fortinet FortiProxymatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-27997 · Fortinet FortiOS-6K7Kmatches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2021-20038 · SonicWall SMA100matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2020-0968 · Microsoft Internet Explorer 9matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

14893 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

talos acd systems

Of the 4 records in this family that state one, this holds the lowest EPSS percentile: 0.71697.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2018-3980.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.