vciy

CVE-2018-3840

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the Pixar Renderman IT Display Service 21.6 (0x67)

CVE-2018-38404 of 4 sources documented this
21

rank 21 = 0 + 19 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.01617  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$19,400over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$19,400 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.01617 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.01617EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-04-14, 1888 days at 0.02, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2022-47966CVE-2022-29499VMware vCenterQNAP Systems Inc.MicrosoftQNAP NAS devices3840

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Talos5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Scoring standard
TalosCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt
What it costs
TalosPartial availability lossreceipt
NVDComplete availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running Talos Pixar Renderman? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-20 Improper Input Validation; CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereferencereceipt
Published consequencesCWE-20: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Confidentiality: Read Memory, Read Files or Directories…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.01617 · top 25% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bytalosreceipt
Recorded changes17 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productTalos Pixar Rendermanreceipt
Published rangespixar renderman 21.6receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the Pixar Renderman IT Display Service 21.6 (0x67). The vulnerability is present in the parsing of a network packet without proper validation of the packet. The data read by the application is not validated, and its use can lead to a null pointer dereference. The IT application is opened by a user and then listens for a connection on port 4001. An attacker can deliver an attack once the application has been opened. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
weakness
CWE-20; CWE-476
affected versions
pixar renderman 21.6

The CNA scored it 5.3 and NVD 7.5. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself talosintelligence.com receipt

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.00416
7 Mar 20230.00326 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00122 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.01617 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 17 observations
14 Apr 20210.00416
4 Feb 20220.00885
7 Mar 20230.00326
8 May 20230.00219
5 May 20240.00230
17 Dec 20240.00155
17 Mar 20250.00122
19 Mar 20250.00165
25 Mar 20250.00305
29 Mar 20250.00364
30 Mar 20250.00305
21 Apr 20250.00145
25 May 20250.00305
18 Nov 20250.00503
21 Nov 20250.00305
6 Mar 20260.00307
15 Jun 20260.01617

17 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.01617Published2018-06-26Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 7 years, 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2018-06-26 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2022-47966matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-29499matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-21985 · VMware vCenter Server and VMware Cloud…matches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2018-19949 · QNAP Systems Inc. QTSmatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2019-0604 · Microsoft SharePoint Servermatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2019-7193 · QNAP NAS devicesmatches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2019receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

13347 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

talos pixar renderman

Of the 3 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest EPSS percentile: 0.74378.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2018-3840.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.