vciy

CVE-2018-16874

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

In Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3, the "go get" command is vulnerable to directory traversal when executed with the import path of a…

CVE-2018-168744 of 4 sources documented this
29

rank 29 = 1 + 20 + 1 + 7 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.05039  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 8.1, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 9

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-08-30  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

8 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 22

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$222,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$182,000on 2025-11-24, the last material move, 6 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$222,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.8814887365328109 exposure x 0.05039 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.05039EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity6.8 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2021-04-14, 1888 days at 0.05, as of 2026-06-15. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

MicrosoftAdobe CommerceMicrosoft WindowsCVE-2022-47966CVE-2022-29499VMware vCenter16874

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Redhat6.8 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD8.1 HIGHreceipt
Scoring standard
RedhatCVSS v3.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt
What it costs
RedhatComplete confidentiality and integrity lossreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running [UNKNOWN] golang? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · user interaction required · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality and integrity lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-20 Improper Input Validationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-20: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Confidentiality: Read Memory, Read Files or Directories…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchgo 1.10.6; go 1.11.3receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA6.8 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD8.1 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.05039 · top 8% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth5 products across 4 vendorsderived
Assigned byredhatreceipt
Recorded changes35 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected product[UNKNOWN] golangreceipt
Published rangesgolang go < 1.10.6; golang go >= 1.11.0 < 1.11.3; opensuse backports sle 15.0; opensuse leap 15.0receipt
Show all 8 published ranges
golang go < 1.10.6
golang go >= 1.11.0 < 1.11.3
opensuse backports sle 15.0
opensuse leap 15.0
opensuse leap 15.1
opensuse leap 42.3
suse linux enterprise server 12
debian linux 9.0

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

Attack path

Network requestrequires user interaction[UNKNOWN] golangCWE-20 improper input validationConfidentiality and integrity lossC:H / I:Hexploits CWE-20data compromise

What it is stated by the CNA

In Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3, the "go get" command is vulnerable to directory traversal when executed with the import path of a malicious Go package which contains curly braces (both '{' and '}' characters). Specifically, it is only vulnerable in GOPATH mode, but not in module mode (the distinction is documented at https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-Module_aware_go_get). The attacker can cause an arbitrary filesystem write, which can lead to code execution. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-20; CWE-22
affected versions
golang go < 1.10.6; golang go >= 1.11.0 < 1.11.3; opensuse backports sle 15.0; and 5 more, listed in full below

The CNA scored it 6.8 and NVD 8.1. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself security.gentoo.org bugzilla.redhat.com securityfocus.com groups.google.com lists.opensuse.org lists.opensuse.org +6 morereceipt

Dated events

2025-08-30EPSS moved 0.08 to 0.132025-11-18EPSS moved 0.11 to 0.032025-11-24EPSS moved 0.11 to 0.06

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.04625
7 Mar 20230.02153 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.03463 · scoring model v2025.03.14
30 Aug 20250.12882 · crossed 0.10
11 Oct 20250.09744 · crossed 0.10
14 Oct 20250.11958 · crossed 0.10
18 Nov 20250.03188 · crossed 0.10
21 Nov 20250.10633 · crossed 0.10
24 Nov 20250.06487 · crossed 0.10
15 Jun 20260.05039 · scoring model v2026.06.15

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 35 observations
14 Apr 20210.04625
4 Feb 20220.03806
7 Mar 20230.02153
8 Dec 20230.02445
7 Mar 20240.02436
14 Apr 20240.02432
6 May 20240.02212
15 Jun 20240.01932
9 Jul 20240.01523
23 Oct 20240.01515
23 Nov 20240.01498
17 Dec 20240.02740
17 Mar 20250.03463
29 Mar 20250.07077
30 Mar 20250.03463
14 Aug 20250.03388
20 Aug 20250.07746
30 Aug 20250.12882
29 Sep 20250.12674
11 Oct 20250.09744
14 Oct 20250.11958
19 Oct 20250.12241
21 Oct 20250.13895
22 Oct 20250.11045
3 Nov 20250.10786
14 Nov 20250.10633
18 Nov 20250.03188
21 Nov 20250.10633
24 Nov 20250.06487
25 Nov 20250.02174
27 Nov 20250.01674
16 Jan 20260.02174
9 Mar 20260.06199
11 Mar 20260.05743
15 Jun 20260.05039

35 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.05039Published2018-12-14Index as of2026-06-15

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2025-11-18 and 2025-11-21 (0.03188 → 0.10633) and the record had been public for 7 years, 6 months when this index was last written.

Published 2018-12-14 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2017-0148 · Microsoft Corporation Windows SMBmatches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2025-54236 · Adobe Commercematches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-30040 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 6 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2022-47966matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-29499matches 5 of 9KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-21985 · VMware vCenter Server and VMware Cloud…matches 5 of 10KEV listed · 2021receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

13347 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

[unknown] golang

Of the 3 records in this family that state one, this holds the lowest EPSS percentile: 0.91703.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2018-16874.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.