vciy

CVE-2018-15811

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

DNN (aka DotNetNuke) 9.2 through 9.2.1 uses a weak encryption algorithm to protect input parameters.

CVE-2018-158113 of 4 sources documented this
69

rank 69 = 40 + 19 + 2 + 2 + 6

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.74048 · CISA KEV listed  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.5, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 50

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-10-16  ·  without this subject the record ranks 67

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 67

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

CISA remediation date held  ·  without this subject the record ranks 63

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$2.26Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$145,000on 2025-11-21, the last material move, 9 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$2.26M = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6121449559255632 exposure x 0.74048 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.74048EPSSKEV · LISTED
Severity7.5 HIGHreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationin the wild · KEVreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.21773 to 0.74048 across 34 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2018-18325CVE-2017-1000486CVE-2017-1131715811

This record is one instance of CWE-326, inadequate encryption strength. The index holds 470 prior instances of this class, 3 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strengthreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-326: Access Control, Confidentiality: Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data[email protected]
Ransomware campaign useUnknown to CISAreceipt

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 4 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
CISA remediation statusoverdue since 2022-05-03receipt
CISA required actionApply updates per vendor instructions.receipt
Published to CISA KEV854 daysderived

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed, 2021-11-03.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed2021-11-03receipt
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.5 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.74048 · top 0.54% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes45 · last 18 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesDnnsoftware dotnetnukereceipt
Published rangesdnnsoftware dotnetnuke >= 9.2 <= 9.2.1receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

DNN (aka DotNetNuke) 9.2 through 9.2.1 uses a weak encryption algorithm to protect input parameters. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
weakness
CWE-326
affected versions
dnnsoftware dotnetnuke >= 9.2 <= 9.2.1
also scored by
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

check it yourself github.com dnnsoftware.com packetstormsecurity.com receipt

Dated events

2021-11-03Added to CISA KEV2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.22 to 0.012022-05-03CISA remediation due2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.05 to 0.752026-06-15EPSS moved 0.93 to 0.74

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.21773
4 Feb 20220.00954 · crossed 0.10
7 Mar 20230.01701 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.75277 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
16 Oct 20250.90202 · crossed 0.90
18 Nov 20250.87049 · crossed 0.90
21 Nov 20250.91788 · crossed 0.90
15 Jun 20260.74048 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 34 observations
14 Apr 20210.21773
4 Feb 20220.00954
7 Mar 20230.01701
22 Apr 20230.02209
8 May 20230.02205
26 Jun 20230.03093
8 Jul 20230.03099
28 Aug 20230.04325
26 Jun 20240.03998
14 Jul 20240.03670
31 Jul 20240.03699
19 Aug 20240.04489
24 Sep 20240.05180
23 Nov 20240.04427
14 Dec 20240.04072
17 Dec 20240.04875
17 Mar 20250.75277
29 Mar 20250.83063
30 Mar 20250.75277
21 Jun 20250.76118
28 Jul 20250.75191
16 Oct 20250.90202
17 Oct 20250.91142
5 Nov 20250.9148
18 Nov 20250.87049
21 Nov 20250.91788
9 Dec 20250.9148
25 Dec 20250.91142
4 Mar 20260.90816
13 Mar 20260.93016
17 Mar 20260.93224
15 Apr 20260.93004
3 Jun 20260.92962
15 Jun 20260.74048

34 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.74048Published2019-07-03CISA KEV2021-11-03Index as of2026-09-04

Listed by CISA 854 days after it published and the record had been public for 7 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

No material movement in 81 days as of the last ingest this index recorded.

Published 2019-07-03 receipt · CISA KEV 2021-11-03 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-04 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-326, inadequate encryption strength. The index holds 470 prior instances of this class, 3 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2018-18325matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2017-1000486matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2017-11317matches 6 of 8KEV listed · 2017receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

470 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

advisory published by dnnsoftware.com

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2018-15811.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.