vciy

CVE-2017-5174

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

An Authentication Bypass issue was discovered in Geutebruck IP Camera G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.11.0.12

CVE-2017-51744 of 4 sources documented this
44

rank 44 = 13 + 25 + 4 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.52290  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2026-03-18  ·  without this subject the record ranks 40

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 42

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 44

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$2.61Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$611,000on 2026-09-06, the last material move
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$2.61M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.5229 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.5229EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.0771 to 0.5229 across 18 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Fortinet FortiOSJetBrainsF5 BIG-IPFortinet FortiWebKentico Xperience5174

This record is one instance of CWE-288, authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel. The index holds 681 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Geutebruck IP Cameras? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-288 Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channelreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-288: Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 6 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.5229 · top 1% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byicscertreceipt
Recorded changes18 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productGeutebruck IP Camerasreceipt
Published rangesgeutebruck ip camera g-cam efd-2250 firmware 1.11.0.12receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

An Authentication Bypass issue was discovered in Geutebruck IP Camera G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.11.0.12. An authentication bypass vulnerability has been identified. The existing file system architecture could allow attackers to bypass the access control that may allow remote code execution. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-288
affected versions
geutebruck ip camera g-cam efd-2250 firmware 1.11.0.12

check it yourself securityfocus.com ics-cert.us-cert.gov exploit-db.com receipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.09 to 0.902026-09-06EPSS moved 0.40 to 0.52

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.0771
7 Mar 20230.89818 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2023.03.01
28 Apr 20230.77443
17 Dec 20240.66342
17 Mar 20250.38216 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
18 Nov 20250.68741 · crossed 0.50
21 Nov 20250.38216 · crossed 0.50
18 Mar 20260.6522 · crossed 0.50
15 Jun 20260.5229 · scoring model v2026.06.15
23 Aug 20260.40046 · crossed 0.50
30 Aug 20260.5229 · crossed 0.50
5 Sep 20260.40046 · crossed 0.50
6 Sep 20260.5229 · crossed 0.50
Show all 18 observations
14 Apr 20210.0771
4 Feb 20220.08918
12 Feb 20220.09149
7 Mar 20230.89818
28 Mar 20230.85020
28 Apr 20230.77443
17 Dec 20240.66342
17 Mar 20250.38216
29 Mar 20250.41446
30 Mar 20250.38216
18 Nov 20250.68741
21 Nov 20250.38216
18 Mar 20260.6522
15 Jun 20260.5229
23 Aug 20260.40046
30 Aug 20260.5229
5 Sep 20260.40046
6 Sep 20260.5229

18 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.5229Published2017-05-19Index as of2026-09-06

The record had been public for 9 years, 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2017-05-19 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-06 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-288, authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel. The index holds 681 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-55591 · Fortinet FortiOSmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-27198 · JetBrains TeamCitymatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-42793 · JetBrains TeamCitymatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-46747 · F5 BIG-IPmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2026-24858 · Fortinet FortiWebmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-2746 · Kentico Xperiencematches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2025receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

681 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

ICSA-17-045-02

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2017-5174.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.