vciy

CVE-2017-3881

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A vulnerability in the Cisco Cluster Management Protocol (CMP) processing code in Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated…

CVE-2017-38814 of 4 sources documented this
75

rank 75 = 40 + 25 + 0 + 4 + 6

rank@v1 · act now

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.98950 · CISA KEV listed  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 50

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 75

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

2 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 71

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

CISA remediation date held  ·  without this subject the record ranks 69

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$4.94Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$2.16Mon 2022-02-04, the last material move, 4 years, 7 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$4.94M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.9895 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.9895EPSSKEV · LISTED
Severity9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationin the wild · KEVreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-02-04, 1686 days at 0.99, as of 2026-09-17. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2022-47966CVE-2022-29499VMware vCenterQNAP Systems Inc.MicrosoftQNAP NAS devices3881

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-20 Improper Input Validationreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-20: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Confidentiality: Read Memory, Read Files or Directories…[email protected]
Ransomware campaign useUnknown to CISAreceipt

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 17 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
CISA remediation statusoverdue since 2022-04-15receipt
CISA required actionApply updates per vendor instructions.receipt
Published to CISA KEV1834 daysderived

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed, 2022-03-25.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 5 public repositories2017-04-10receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed2022-03-25receipt
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.8 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.9895 · top 0.07% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byciscoreceipt
Recorded changes40 · last 17 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productCisco IOS and IOS XE Softwarereceipt
Published rangescisco ios >= 12.2s <= 15.1\(3\)svs; cisco ios xe >= 3.2sg <= 3.9ereceipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability in the Cisco Cluster Management Protocol (CMP) processing code in Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of an affected device or remotely execute code with elevated privileges. The Cluster Management Protocol utilizes Telnet internally as a signaling and command protocol between cluster members. The vulnerability is due to the combination of two factors: (1) the failure to restrict the use of CMP-specific Telnet options only to internal, local communications between cluster members and instead accept and process such options over any Telnet connection to an affected device; and (2) the incorrect processing of mal receipt

Read the rest of the CNA's description

formed CMP-specific Telnet options. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malformed CMP-specific Telnet options while establishing a Telnet session with an affected Cisco device configured to accept Telnet connections. An exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the device or cause a reload of the affected device. This affects Catalyst switches, Embedded Service 2020 switches, Enhanced Layer 2 EtherSwitch Service Module, Enhanced Layer 2/3 EtherSwitch Service Module, Gigabit Ethernet Switch Module (CGESM) for HP, IE Industrial Ethernet switches, ME 4924-10GE switch, RF Gateway 10, and SM-X Layer 2/3 EtherSwitch Service Module. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvd48893.

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-20
affected versions
cisco ios >= 12.2s <= 15.1\(3\)svs; cisco ios xe >= 3.2sg <= 3.9e
also scored by
9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself exploit-db.com exploit-db.com securityfocus.com securityfocus.com tools.cisco.com securitytracker.com receipt

Dated events

2022-02-04EPSS moved 0.52 to 0.952022-03-25Added to CISA KEV2022-04-15CISA remediation due

Movement the material steps

14 Apr 20210.52031
4 Feb 20220.95332 · crossed 0.90
7 Mar 20230.97402 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.94117 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.98975 · scoring model v2026.06.15
17 Sep 20260.9895
Show all 26 observations
14 Apr 20210.52031
4 Feb 20220.95332
7 Mar 20230.97402
2 Apr 20230.97431
13 May 20230.97378
21 Jun 20230.97332
2 Aug 20230.97384
11 Sep 20230.97470
18 Feb 20240.97450
29 Mar 20240.97481
17 Dec 20240.97502
17 Mar 20250.94117
27 Mar 20250.94125
28 Mar 20250.94117
29 Mar 20250.9421
30 Mar 20250.94117
7 Jun 20250.94083
16 Sep 20250.93968
17 Oct 20250.93901
19 Oct 20250.9402
24 Oct 20250.93959
5 Nov 20250.93968
6 Nov 20250.94029
1 Jan 20260.94282
15 Jun 20260.98975
17 Sep 20260.9895

26 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.9895Published2017-03-17Public PoC2017-04-10CISA KEV2022-03-25Index as of2026-09-17

Listed by CISA 1834 days after it published and the record had been public for 9 years, 6 months when this index was last written.

Published 2017-03-17 receipt · Public PoC 2017-04-10 receipt · CISA KEV 2022-03-25 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-17 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-20, improper input validation. The index holds 13347 prior instances of this class, 73 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2022-47966matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2022-29499matches 8 of 8KEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-21985 · VMware vCenter Server and VMware Cloud…matches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2018-19949 · QNAP Systems Inc. QTSmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2019-0604 · Microsoft SharePoint Servermatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2019receipt
CVE-2019-7193 · QNAP NAS devicesmatches 8 of 9KEV listed · 2019receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

13347 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Its defect family

cisco ios and ios xe software

Of the 5 records in this family that state one, this holds the highest NVD CVSS score: 9.8.

Grouped by shared product and weakness, not by shared vulnerability. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Family membership: held values

This record is one of a group, and the group's page describes all of them. This page is kept and dated, and the defect family's own page is the one we offer for indexing: the whole group.

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2017-3881.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.