vciy

CVE-2017-20162

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

vercel ms index.js parse redos

CVE-2017-201624 of 4 sources documented this
15

rank 15 = 0 + 13 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.00989  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 13

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$11,900over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$11,900 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.24048551839932833 exposure x 0.00989 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.00989EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity4.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementdoubled within 72hreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2023-01-06, 1347 days at 0.01, as of 2026-09-14. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
VulDB4.3 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD5.3 MEDIUMreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running vercel ms? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-1333 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexityreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-1333: Availability: DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchms 2.0.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA4.3 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD5.3 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.00989 · top 39% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byVulDBreceipt
Recorded changes30 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productvercel msreceipt
Published rangesvercel ms < 2.0.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in vercel ms up to 1.x. This issue affects the function parse of the file index.js. The manipulation of the argument str leads to inefficient regular expression complexity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.0.0 is able to address this issue. The patch is named caae2988ba2a37765d055c4eee63d383320ee662. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-217451. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
weakness
CWE-1333
affected versions
vercel ms < 2.0.0
also scored by
[email protected] 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

The CNA scored it 4.3 and NVD 5.3. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself vuldb.com vuldb.com github.com github.com github.com receipt

Movement the material steps

6 Jan 20230.0095
7 Mar 20235.2e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00046 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.00981 · scoring model v2026.06.15
14 Sep 20260.00989

This score more than doubled inside 72 hours. Both observations are in the full history below.

Show all 30 observations
6 Jan 20230.0095
12 Jan 20230.01018
7 Mar 20235.2e-4
8 Mar 20230.00052
6 Dec 20230.00063
12 Jan 20240.00101
7 Feb 20240.00121
11 Apr 20240.00127
17 Jun 20240.00151
28 Jul 20240.00171
17 Dec 20240.00179
17 Mar 20250.00046
29 Mar 20250.00192
30 Mar 20250.00046
6 Apr 20250.00029
4 May 20250.00046
20 Jul 20250.00029
30 Sep 20250.00033
22 Oct 20250.00034
1 Nov 20250.00036
4 Nov 20250.00042
17 Dec 20250.00068
6 Jan 20260.0008
12 Jan 20260.00312
13 Jan 20260.00567
12 Mar 20260.00379
1 Apr 20260.00312
14 Jun 20260.00353
15 Jun 20260.00981
14 Sep 20260.00989

30 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.00989Published2023-01-05Index as of2026-09-14

Exploit probability more than doubled between 2026-06-14 and 2026-06-15 (0.00353 → 0.00981) and the record had been public for 3 years, 8 months when this index was last written.

Published 2023-01-05 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-14 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2017-20162.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.