vciy

CVE-2016-9603

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in QEMU's Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA emulator's VNC display driver support before 2.9…

CVE-2016-96034 of 4 sources documented this
36

rank 36 = 1 + 25 + 0 + 10 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.04448  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.9, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 11

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 36

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

20 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 36

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$127,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$127,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.5743756121449558 exposure x 0.04448 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.04448EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmpartial impactreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-02-04, 1675 days at 0.04, as of 2026-09-06. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft WindowsFortinetLinuxMicrosoft Windows9603

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
Redhat5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
NVD9.9 CRITICALreceipt
What it costs
RedhatPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
NVDComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running QEMU Qemu:? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachreachable from an adjacent network · low privileges required · no user interaction · high attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability loss, with impact beyond the vulnerable componentreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflowreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-122: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Execute…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchqemu 2.9.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA5.5 MEDIUMreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.9 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.04448 · top 9% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth8 products across 4 vendorsderived
Assigned byredhatreceipt
Recorded changes26 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productQEMU Qemu:receipt
Published rangesqemu < 2.9.0; citrix xenserver 6.0.2; citrix xenserver 6.2.0; citrix xenserver 6.5receipt
Show all 20 published ranges
qemu < 2.9.0
citrix xenserver 6.0.2
citrix xenserver 6.2.0
citrix xenserver 6.5
citrix xenserver 7.0
citrix xenserver 7.1
redhat openstack 5.0
redhat openstack 6.0
redhat openstack 7.0
redhat openstack 8
redhat openstack 9
redhat openstack 10
debian linux 7.0
redhat enterprise linux desktop 6.0
redhat enterprise linux desktop 7.0
redhat enterprise linux server 6.0
redhat enterprise linux server 7.0
redhat enterprise linux server aus 7.3
redhat enterprise linux server aus 7.4
redhat enterprise linux server eus 7.3

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in QEMU's Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA emulator's VNC display driver support before 2.9; the issue could occur when a VNC client attempted to update its display after a VGA operation is performed by a guest. A privileged user/process inside a guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process or, potentially, execute arbitrary code on the host with privileges of the QEMU process. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.9 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-122; CWE-119
affected versions
qemu < 2.9.0; citrix xenserver 6.0.2; citrix xenserver 6.2.0; and 17 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 5.5 CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

The CNA scored it 5.5 and NVD 9.9. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself securityfocus.com access.redhat.com access.redhat.com lists.debian.org security.gentoo.org access.redhat.com +12 morereceipt

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.02993
7 Mar 20230.00128 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.01894 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.04448 · scoring model v2026.06.15
6 Sep 20260.04448
Show all 26 observations
4 Feb 20220.02993
7 Mar 20230.00128
24 Mar 20230.00125
21 Jul 20230.00174
19 Oct 20230.00179
20 Feb 20240.00140
5 Jun 20240.00137
6 Jul 20240.00135
17 Mar 20250.01894
29 Mar 20250.04368
30 Mar 20250.01894
3 Apr 20250.01471
12 May 20250.01443
30 May 20250.00563
3 Jun 20250.01523
14 Dec 20250.01381
18 Dec 20250.01419
25 Dec 20250.01381
10 Feb 20260.01587
17 May 20260.00587
25 May 20260.00634
15 Jun 20260.04448
23 Aug 20260.03936
30 Aug 20260.04448
5 Sep 20260.03936
6 Sep 20260.04448

26 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.04448Published2018-07-27Index as of2026-09-06

The record had been public for 8 years, 1 month when this index was last written.

Published 2018-07-27 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-06 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2024-30051 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 2 of 10KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-23376 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507matches 2 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-28252 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809matches 2 of 10KEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2025-25249 · Fortinet FortiSwitchManagermatches 2 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-53362 · Linuxmatches 2 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-85880 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607matches 2 of 10KEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3216 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2016-9603.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.