vciy

CVE-2014-3153

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

The futex_requeue function in kernel/futex.c in the Linux kernel through 3.14.5 does not ensure that calls have two different futex addresses, which…

CVE-2014-31533 of 4 sources documented this
76

rank 76 = 40 + 20 + 1 + 9 + 6

rank@v1 · act now

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.37233 · CISA KEV listed  ·  without this subject the record ranks 36

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 56

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2026-06-06  ·  without this subject the record ranks 75

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

15 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 67

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

CISA remediation date held  ·  without this subject the record ranks 70

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$1.86Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$1.86M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.37233 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.37233EPSSKEV · LISTED
Severity7.8 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationin the wild · KEVreceipt
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.02302 to 0.37233 across 72 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachneeds local access · low privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v3.1 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classNo CWE mapping in held sources.
Ransomware campaign useUnknown to CISAreceipt

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchkernel 3.10.42; kernel 3.12.22; kernel 3.14.6; kernel 3.2.60; kernel 3.4.92receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.
CISA remediation statusoverdue since 2022-06-15receipt
CISA required actionApply updates per vendor instructions.receipt
Published to CISA KEV2909 daysderived

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed, 2022-05-25.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 9 public repositories2014-07-24receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed2022-05-25receipt
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD7.8 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.37233 · top 2% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth9 products across 6 vendorsderived
Assigned byChromereceipt
Recorded changes86 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesLinux kernel; Oracle linux; Canonical ubuntu linux; and 6 morereceipt
Published rangeslinux kernel < 3.2.60; linux kernel >= 3.3 < 3.4.92; linux kernel >= 3.5 < 3.10.42; linux kernel >= 3.11 < 3.12.22receipt
Show all 15 published ranges
linux kernel < 3.2.60
linux kernel >= 3.3 < 3.4.92
linux kernel >= 3.5 < 3.10.42
linux kernel >= 3.11 < 3.12.22
linux kernel >= 3.13 < 3.14.6
redhat enterprise linux server aus 6.2
opensuse 11.4
suse linux enterprise desktop 11
suse linux enterprise high availability extension 11
suse linux enterprise real time extension 11
suse linux enterprise server 11
canonical ubuntu linux 12.04
canonical ubuntu linux 14.04
oracle linux 5
oracle linux 6

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

The futex_requeue function in kernel/futex.c in the Linux kernel through 3.14.5 does not ensure that calls have two different futex addresses, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted FUTEX_REQUEUE command that facilitates unsafe waiter modification. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
affected versions
linux kernel < 3.2.60; linux kernel >= 3.3 < 3.4.92; linux kernel >= 3.5 < 3.10.42; and 12 more, listed in full below
also scored by
7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

check it yourself securityfocus.com lists.opensuse.org openwall.com secunia.com debian.org lists.opensuse.org +14 morereceipt

Dated events

2022-05-25Added to CISA KEV2022-06-15CISA remediation due2025-03-17EPSS moved 0.01 to 0.872025-10-22EPSS moved 0.81 to 0.712026-06-15EPSS moved 0.75 to 0.37

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.02302
7 Mar 20235.2e-4 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.86625 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
22 Oct 20250.7136
15 Jun 20260.37233 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 72 observations
4 Feb 20220.02302
7 Mar 20235.2e-4
8 Mar 20230.00052
8 Nov 20230.00129
3 Jul 20240.00628
30 Oct 20240.00820
17 Dec 20240.01055
23 Dec 20240.00535
17 Mar 20250.86625
4 Apr 20250.86352
5 Apr 20250.86625
8 Apr 20250.86352
9 Apr 20250.86625
14 Apr 20250.86352
15 Apr 20250.86625
16 Apr 20250.86352
17 Apr 20250.86625
19 Apr 20250.85258
30 Apr 20250.84939
4 May 20250.85258
5 May 20250.82357
19 May 20250.82586
27 May 20250.82178
29 May 20250.82586
30 May 20250.82178
31 May 20250.82586
1 Jun 20250.81942
6 Jun 20250.82357
25 Jun 20250.8351
5 Jul 20250.81444
7 Jul 20250.81689
8 Jul 20250.81444
22 Jul 20250.82581
11 Aug 20250.80511
16 Aug 20250.80773
22 Aug 20250.80511
1 Sep 20250.81239
4 Sep 20250.80511
16 Sep 20250.80773
25 Sep 20250.79178
27 Sep 20250.78889
1 Oct 20250.79694
4 Oct 20250.78889
6 Oct 20250.79921
7 Oct 20250.80511
22 Oct 20250.7136
31 Oct 20250.68892
1 Nov 20250.7011
4 Nov 20250.68892
13 Nov 20250.7136
25 Nov 20250.71763
1 Dec 20250.72874
4 Dec 20250.71763
8 Dec 20250.7136
28 Dec 20250.75331
11 Jan 20260.7136
18 Jan 20260.71763
27 Jan 20260.72582
29 Jan 20260.7219
1 Feb 20260.73285
2 Feb 20260.76043
18 Feb 20260.7219
1 Mar 20260.73285
2 Mar 20260.7011
4 Mar 20260.68892
21 Apr 20260.69328
22 Apr 20260.68892
23 May 20260.7136
26 May 20260.68892
4 Jun 20260.7136
6 Jun 20260.75331
15 Jun 20260.37233

72 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.37233Published2014-06-07Public PoC2014-07-24CISA KEV2022-05-25Index as of2026-09-04

Listed by CISA 2909 days after it published and the record had been public for 12 years, 2 months when this index was last written.

No material movement in 81 days as of the last ingest this index recorded.

Published 2014-06-07 receipt · Public PoC 2014-07-24 receipt · CISA KEV 2022-05-25 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-04 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2014-3153.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.