vciy

CVE-2014-1494

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the browser engine in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.25 allow remote attackers to cause a…

CVE-2014-14943 of 4 sources documented this
32

rank 32 = 1 + 23 + 0 + 8 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.05102  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 9

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

9 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 24

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$255,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$255,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.05102 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.05102EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementsteadyreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-02-04, 1638 days at 0.05, as of 2026-07-31. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authenticationreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classNo CWE mapping in held sources.

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchfirefox 28.0; seamonkey 2.25receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.05102 · top 8% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth8 products across 4 vendorsderived
Assigned bymozillareceipt
Recorded changes12 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesMozilla seamonkey; Mozilla firefox; Opensuse project opensuse; and 5 morereceipt
Published rangesmozilla seamonkey < 2.25; suse linux enterprise desktop 11; suse linux enterprise server 11; suse linux enterprise software development kit 11receipt
Show all 9 published ranges
mozilla seamonkey < 2.25
suse linux enterprise desktop 11
suse linux enterprise server 11
suse linux enterprise software development kit 11
oracle solaris 11.3
opensuse 13.1
opensuse project opensuse 11.4
opensuse project opensuse 12.3
mozilla firefox < 28.0

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the browser engine in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.25 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
affected versions
mozilla seamonkey < 2.25; suse linux enterprise desktop 11; suse linux enterprise server 11; and 6 more, listed in full below

check it yourself bugzilla.mozilla.org bugzilla.mozilla.org security.gentoo.org lists.opensuse.org oracle.com bugzilla.mozilla.org +10 morereceipt

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.06604
7 Mar 20230.00462 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.00387 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.05079 · scoring model v2026.06.15
31 Jul 20260.05102
Show all 12 observations
4 Feb 20220.06604
7 Mar 20230.00462
30 Jan 20240.00530
4 Oct 20240.00638
17 Dec 20240.00647
17 Mar 20250.00387
29 Mar 20250.01766
30 Mar 20250.00387
27 Aug 20250.00485
2 Nov 20250.00556
15 Jun 20260.05079
31 Jul 20260.05102

12 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.05102Published2014-03-19Index as of2026-07-31

The record had been public for 12 years, 4 months when this index was last written.

Published 2014-03-19 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-31 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2014-1494.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.