vciy

CVE-2014-0781

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Yokogawa CENTUM CS 3000 Heap-based Buffer Overflow

CVE-2014-07814 of 4 sources documented this
37

rank 37 = 6 + 23 + 0 + 8 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.25359  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 14

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 37

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

12 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 29

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 37

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$1.27Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$1.27M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.25359 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.25359EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
FALLING10Fallen from 0.6 to 0.25359 across 21 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2009-3459Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft WindowsFortinetFortinet0781

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Running Yokogawa CENTUM CS 3000? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authenticationreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflowreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-122: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Execute…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA9.3 CRITICALreceipt
CVSS, NVD9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.25359 · top 2% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byicscertreceipt
Recorded changes21 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productYokogawa CENTUM CS 3000receipt
Published rangesyokogawa centum cs 3000 <= r3.09.50; yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.01; yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.02; yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.03receipt
Show all 12 published ranges
yokogawa centum cs 3000 <= r3.09.50
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.01
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.02
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.03
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.04
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.05
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.06
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.07
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.08
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.08.50
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.08.70
yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.09

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Heap-based buffer overflow in BKCLogSvr.exe in Yokogawa CENTUM CS 3000 R3.09.50 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted UDP packets. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
weakness
CWE-122; CWE-119
affected versions
yokogawa centum cs 3000 <= r3.09.50; yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.01; yokogawa centum cs 3000 r3.02; and 9 more, listed in full below
also scored by
[email protected] 9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

check it yourself cisa.gov securityfocus.com community.rapid7.com yokogawa.com receipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.60 to 0.132026-06-15EPSS moved 0.08 to 0.25

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.6
7 Mar 20230.12885 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.05466 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.25359 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 21 observations
4 Feb 20220.6
7 Mar 20230.12885
9 Dec 20230.13367
25 Jan 20240.17247
12 Mar 20240.22704
30 Apr 20240.11317
29 Sep 20240.11573
29 Nov 20240.13461
17 Dec 20240.15888
1 Feb 20250.12794
17 Mar 20250.05466
19 Mar 20250.05247
29 Mar 20250.05868
30 Mar 20250.05247
26 Sep 20250.07956
28 Sep 20250.07714
3 Oct 20250.07956
21 Feb 20260.09684
19 Apr 20260.07956
4 May 20260.07516
15 Jun 20260.25359

21 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.25359Published2014-03-14Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 12 years, 3 months when this index was last written.

Published 2014-03-14 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow. The index holds 3216 prior instances of this class, 20 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2009-3459matches 7 of 7KEV listed · 2009receipt
CVE-2024-30051 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-23376 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-27997 · Fortinet FortiOS-6K7Konly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-28252 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809only 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2025-25249 · Fortinet FortiSwitchManageronly 2 attributes comparableKEV listed · 2026receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

3216 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

icsa-14-070-01a

Of the 4 records in this advisory that state one, this holds the highest NVD CVSS score: 9.3.

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2014-0781.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.