vciy

CVE-2013-3539

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the command/user.cgi in Sony SNC CH140, SNC CH180, SNC CH240, SNC CH280, SNC DH140, SNC DH140T…

CVE-2013-35392 of 4 sources documented this
19

rank 19 = 2 + 17 + 0 + 0 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.08756  ·  without this subject the record ranks 17

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 6.8, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 2

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

0 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$281,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$281,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.6442432101309884 exposure x 0.08756 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.08756EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity6.8 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementsteadyreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2022-02-04, 1637 days at 0.09, as of 2026-07-30. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2008-4128ray-project rayPaperCut NG/MFCVE-2020-10181CVE-2016-6277CVE-2014-1000053539

This record is one instance of CWE-352, cross-site request forgery (csrf). The index holds 9825 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authenticationreceipt
ImpactPartial confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)receipt
Published consequencesCWE-352: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation, Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 30 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD6.8 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.08756 · top 5% of all CVEsreceipt
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes21 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productNot named in held sources. Without a product name this record cannot be matched against an inventory, by us or by anyone.

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the command/user.cgi in Sony SNC CH140, SNC CH180, SNC CH240, SNC CH280, SNC DH140, SNC DH140T, SNC DH180, SNC DH240, SNC DH240T, SNC DH280, and possibly other camera models allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add users. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
6.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
weakness
CWE-352

check it yourself seclists.org receipt

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.07584
7 Mar 20230.00319 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.01162 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.06302 · scoring model v2026.06.15
30 Jul 20260.08756
Show all 21 observations
4 Feb 20220.07584
15 Mar 20220.07032
5 Mar 20230.06464
7 Mar 20230.00319
5 Jan 20240.00314
8 Feb 20240.00145
15 Mar 20240.00159
25 Apr 20240.00158
10 May 20240.00157
17 Sep 20240.00318
25 Oct 20240.00330
17 Dec 20240.00316
25 Dec 20240.00353
17 Mar 20250.01162
29 Mar 20250.00587
30 Mar 20250.01162
17 May 20250.01079
16 Sep 20250.0143
15 Jun 20260.06302
27 Jun 20260.08788
30 Jul 20260.08756

21 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.08756Published2013-10-01Index as of2026-07-30

The record had been public for 12 years, 9 months when this index was last written.

Published 2013-10-01 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-30 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-352, cross-site request forgery (csrf). The index holds 9825 prior instances of this class, 6 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2008-4128matches 3 of 6KEV listed · 2008receipt
CVE-2025-62593 · ray-project raynothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2023-2533 · PaperCut NG/MFnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2020-10181nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2016-6277nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2016receipt
CVE-2014-100005nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2015receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

9825 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Fixed with these, by one advisory

Listed because one advisory covers them, not because they are the same defect. Each record's own state is on its own page.

Grouping: held values

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2013-3539.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.