vciy

CVE-2013-10059

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

D-Link Routers tools_vct.htm OS Command Injection

CVE-2013-100594 of 4 sources documented this
33

rank 33 = 5 + 18 + 8 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.19110  ·  without this subject the record ranks 28

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 7.2, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 15

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-10-08  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$954,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$2.82Mon 2025-10-08, the last material move, 8 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$954,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.1911 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.1911EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity8.6 HIGHreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.00238 to 0.1911 across 15 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

BeyondTrustPalo AltoBerriAI litellmPHPCVE-2024-51378CVE-2023-4320810059

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Sources disagree here.

Severity score
VulnCheck8.6 HIGHreceipt
NVD7.2 HIGHreceipt
Scoring standard
VulnCheckCVSS v4.0receipt
NVDCVSS v3.1receipt

Both shown, dated. We don't pick winners. disagreement-rules@v1

Running D-Link DIR-615H1? Check your version

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · high privileges required · no user interaction · low attack complexity · no attack requirementsreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v4.0 · the CNA's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-78: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, the CNA8.6 HIGHreceipt
CVSS, NVD7.2 HIGHreceipt
Exploit probability0.1911 · top 3% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned byVulnCheckreceipt
Recorded changes15 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Affected productD-Link DIR-615H1receipt
Published rangesdlink dir-615h firmware <= 8.04receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

An authenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists in various D-Link routers (tested on DIR-615H1 running firmware version 8.04) via the tools_vct.htm endpoint. The web interface fails to sanitize input passed from the ping_ipaddr parameter to the tools_vct.htm diagnostic interface, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands using backtick encapsulation. With default credentials, an attacker can exploit this blind injection vector to execute arbitrary commands. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
7.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
weakness
CWE-78
affected versions
dlink dir-615h firmware <= 8.04
also scored by
[email protected] 8.6 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

The CNA scored it 8.6 and NVD 7.2. Both are shown because both were published; we do not pick one.

check it yourself raw.githubusercontent.com exploit-db.com exploit-db.com web.archive.org vulncheck.com receipt

Dated events

2025-10-08EPSS moved 0.01 to 0.572026-06-15EPSS moved 0.75 to 0.19

Movement the material steps

2 Aug 20250.00238
8 Oct 20250.57146 · crossed 0.10 and 0.50
28 May 20260.72383
15 Jun 20260.1911 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 15 observations
2 Aug 20250.00238
7 Aug 20250.00337
2 Sep 20250.00328
12 Sep 20250.00443
21 Sep 20250.00385
24 Sep 20250.00398
25 Sep 20250.00553
8 Oct 20250.57146
1 Dec 20250.59799
28 Dec 20250.52363
29 Dec 20250.50834
17 Apr 20260.54929
28 May 20260.72383
9 Jun 20260.74813
15 Jun 20260.1911

15 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.1911Published2025-08-01Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 10 months when this index was last written.

Published 2025-08-01 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection'). The index holds 6775 prior instances of this class, 121 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-1731 · BeyondTrust Remote Support(RS) & Privileged…matches 7 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2024-9474 · Palo Alto Networks Cloud NGFWmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2026-42271 · BerriAI litellmmatches 6 of 9KEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2024-4577 · PHPonly 1 attribute comparableKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2024-51378nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-43208nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

6775 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2013-10059.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.