vciy

CVE-2013-0145

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Buffer overflow in the TFTPD service in Serva32 2.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute…

CVE-2013-01453 of 4 sources documented this
18

rank 18 = 2 + 13 + 1 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.08868  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.0, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 5

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-09-21  ·  without this subject the record ranks 17

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 18

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$127,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$127,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.28625080150224425 exposure x 0.08868 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.08868EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
FALLING10Fallen from 0.23804 to 0.08868 across 16 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2015-2546Citrix NetScalerMicrosoft WindowsMicrosoftCVE-2017-1000253Microsoft Office0145

This record is one instance of CWE-119, improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer. The index holds 14297 prior instances of this class, 57 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authentication · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Bufferreceipt
Published consequencesCWE-119: Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Modify Memory; Availability, Confidentiality: Read Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.08868 · top 5% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bycertccreceipt
Recorded changes16 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesVercot serva32receipt
Published rangesvercot serva32 2.1.0receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Buffer overflow in the TFTPD service in Serva32 2.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string in a read request. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
weakness
CWE-119
affected versions
vercot serva32 2.1.0

check it yourself kb.cert.org receipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.24 to 0.052026-06-15EPSS moved 0.31 to 0.09

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.23804
7 Mar 20230.05303 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.25109 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.08868 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 16 observations
4 Feb 20220.23804
7 Mar 20230.05303
23 Aug 20230.03813
5 Dec 20230.03869
8 Feb 20240.01831
15 Mar 20240.02023
28 Mar 20240.02064
12 Apr 20240.02535
25 Apr 20240.02352
17 Sep 20240.03372
17 Mar 20250.25109
29 Mar 20250.16881
30 Mar 20250.25109
21 Sep 20250.30303
20 Nov 20250.314
15 Jun 20260.08868

16 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.08868Published2013-05-19Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 13 years when this index was last written.

Published 2013-05-19 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-119, improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer. The index holds 14297 prior instances of this class, 57 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2015-2546matches 1 of 6KEV listed · 2015receipt
CVE-2023-4966 · Citrix NetScaler ADCnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2020-0796 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit…nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2020receipt
CVE-2017-0101 · Microsoft Corporation Windowsnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2017-1000253nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2017receipt
CVE-2017-11882 · Microsoft Officenothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2017receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

14297 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2013-0145.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.