vciy

CVE-2009-3301

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Integer underflow in filter/ww8/ww8par2.cxx in OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 3.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application…

CVE-2009-33013 of 4 sources documented this
33

rank 33 = 3 + 23 + 0 + 7 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.12041  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

7 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 26

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$601,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$384,000on 2024-05-21, the last material move, 2 years, 2 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$601,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.12041 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.12041EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseunaffected versions publishedreceipt
Movementrisenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 63 days at 0.12, as of 2026-08-17. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

kernelMicrosoft WindowsCVE-2014-04973301

This record is one instance of CWE-191, integer underflow (wrap or wraparound). The index holds 579 prior instances of this class, 3 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authenticationreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-191 Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)receipt
Published consequencesCWE-191: Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Instability; Integrity: Modify Memory…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

First unaffected version, by branchopenoffice 3.2.0receipt
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.12041 · top 4% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth3 products across 3 vendorsderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes18 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesApache openoffice; Canonical ubuntu linux; Debian linuxreceipt
Published rangesapache openoffice < 3.2.0; canonical ubuntu linux 8.04; canonical ubuntu linux 8.10; canonical ubuntu linux 9.04receipt
Show all 7 published ranges
apache openoffice < 3.2.0
canonical ubuntu linux 8.04
canonical ubuntu linux 8.10
canonical ubuntu linux 9.04
canonical ubuntu linux 9.10
debian linux 4.0
debian linux 5.0

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Integer underflow in filter/ww8/ww8par2.cxx in OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 3.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted sprmTDefTable table property modifier in a Word document. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
weakness
CWE-191
affected versions
apache openoffice < 3.2.0; canonical ubuntu linux 8.04; canonical ubuntu linux 8.10; and 4 more, listed in full below

check it yourself mandriva.com secunia.com gentoo.org bugzilla.redhat.com exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com secunia.com +14 morereceipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.08 to 0.472026-06-15EPSS moved 0.43 to 0.12

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.06604
7 Mar 20230.47097 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2023.03.01
21 May 20240.54784 · crossed 0.50
17 Mar 20250.42759 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.11997 · scoring model v2026.06.15
17 Aug 20260.12041
Show all 18 observations
4 Feb 20220.06604
8 Feb 20220.07963
17 Jul 20220.06604
18 Jul 20220.07963
7 Mar 20230.47097
21 May 20240.54784
16 Aug 20240.56835
26 Sep 20240.55627
6 Nov 20240.51307
17 Dec 20240.53414
17 Mar 20250.42759
29 Mar 20250.48321
30 Mar 20250.42759
2 Sep 20250.3875
5 Dec 20250.42759
15 Jun 20260.11997
24 Jun 20260.12094
17 Aug 20260.12041

18 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.12041Published2010-02-16Index as of2026-08-17

The record had been public for 16 years, 6 months when this index was last written.

Published 2010-02-16 receipt · Index as of 2026-08-17 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-191, integer underflow (wrap or wraparound). The index holds 579 prior instances of this class, 3 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2022-0185 · kernelnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2021-31956 · Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2021receipt
CVE-2014-0497nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2014receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

579 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2009-3301.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.